# SciFigPlag-Bench: A Benchmark for Provenance-Aware Scientific Figure Plagiarism Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29124 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.29124/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 4 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.06538/) (2017)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [Phi-4-reasoning-vision-15B Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03975/) (2026)
- [Overview of the Plagiarism Detection Task at PAN 2025](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06805/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific figures often encode the visual evidence behind scientific findings, yet figure plagiarism remains underexplored as a benchmarked multimodal evaluation problem. We present SciFigPlag-Bench, a benchmark for provenance-aware reasoning over scientific figures in scholarly documents. Unlike general image-similarity or image-forensics benchmarks, SciFigPlag-Bench evaluates whether a suspicious figure reuses evidence from a specific source figure, how the reused content has been transformed, and where the reused evidence appears. We introduce a factorized taxonomy that separates what is reused from how it is transformed, covering material-preserving reuse, such as full-figure and subfigure reuse, as well as abstract-content reuse, such as data re-expression and structural redraw. Guided by this taxonomy, we construct a hybrid benchmark with 2,582 positive pairs and 2,541 negative pairs, combining documented real-world cases, taxonomy-guided synthetic examples, and visually similar negatives. The benchmark supports four diagnostic tasks: pairwise detection, source attribution, hierarchical reuse-type classification, and reuse correspondence localization. Experiments with diverse vision-language models establish initial baselines and reveal persistent challenges in fine-grained provenance reasoning, reuse-type understanding, and spatial evidence grounding.