# Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning on Clinical EEG Data

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28191 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.28191/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06127/) (2018)
- [Deep Leakage from Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08935/) (2019)
- [The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08119/) (2020)
- [Flower: A Friendly Federated Learning Research Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14390/) (2020)
- [Eluding Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning via Model Inconsistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.07380/) (2021)
- [LightSecAgg: a Lightweight and Versatile Design for Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.14236/) (2021)
- [FastSecAgg: Scalable Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.11248/) (2020)
- [CodedPaddedFL and CodedSecAgg: Straggler Mitigation and Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08909/) (2021)
- [Flamingo: Multi-Round Single-Server Secure Aggregation with Applications to Private Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09883/) (2023)
- [ULDP-FL: Federated Learning with Across Silo User-Level Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12210/) (2023)
- [Efficient Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Federated Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03841/) (2023)
- [SASH: Efficient Secure Aggregation Based on SHPRG For Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.12321/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Differentially Private EEG Feature Anonymization: A Privacy-Utility Case Study in Clinical Neurophysiology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.11777/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning enables multiple institutions to collaboratively train a shared model without exchanging their raw data. However, individual model updates are data-dependent and may reveal information about clients' local training data. This paper presents a privacy-preserving federated learning framework for clinical EEG data that uses masking-based secure aggregation as its core protection mechanism. The framework combines graph-based communication, threshold secret sharing, dropout recovery, local update clipping, an optional Bloom filter-based privacy-preserving record-linkage initialization module, and auxiliary-notary-based verifiability. It supports semi-honest and malicious aggregation settings and is implemented using the Flower federated learning framework. The secure aggregation variants are evaluated in a simulated cross-silo healthcare setting using TUH EEG-derived data under different client configurations. Under the stated assumptions, the secure variants hide individual updates from the aggregation server. The results show that these variants remain compatible with federated model training, although malicious-setting safeguards and lightweight consistency-checking mechanisms introduce additional computation, communication, and round-duration overhead. Among the proposed secure configurations, the base semi-honest variant incurs the lowest overhead; the malicious-server variants add protocol-consistency and authenticity safeguards, and the auxiliary-notary variants add lightweight aggregate-consistency checking.
