# SciFigQual-Bench: A Benchmark for Scientific Figure Quality Assessment with Full-Manuscript Context

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27084 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.27084/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 27 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00398/) (2020)
- [ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05977/) (2023)
- [Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12396/) (2022)
- [Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01569/) (2023)
- [Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09341/) (2023)
- [Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.03685/) (2020)
- [Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined Levels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.17090/) (2023)
- [TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11897/) (2023)
- [DVQA: Understanding Data Visualizations via Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.08163/) (2018)
- [PlotQA: Reasoning over Scientific Plots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.00997/) (2019)
- [CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18521/) (2024)
- [TOPIQ: A Top-down Approach from Semantics to Distortions for Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03060/) (2023)
- [VIEScore: Towards Explainable Metrics for Conditional Image Synthesis Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14867/) (2023)
- [PieAPP: Perceptual Image-Error Assessment through Pairwise Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.02067/) (2018)
- [DePlot: One-shot visual language reasoning by plot-to-table translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10505/) (2022)
- [UniChart: A Universal Vision-language Pretrained Model for Chart Comprehension and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14761/) (2023)
- [Prometheus-Vision: Vision-Language Model as a Judge for Fine-Grained Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06591/) (2024)
- [PaddleOCR-VL: Boosting Multilingual Document Parsing via a 0.9B Ultra-Compact Vision-Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14528/) (2025)
- [SciFIBench: Benchmarking Large Multimodal Models for Scientific Figure Interpretation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.08807/) (2024)
- [SciCap+: A Knowledge Augmented Dataset to Study the Challenges of Scientific Figure Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03491/) (2023)
- [VisJudge-Bench: Aesthetics and Quality Assessment of Visualizations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.22373/) (2025)
- [SIQA: Toward Reliable Scientific Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06700/) (2026)
- [Evaluating Compliance with Visualization Guidelines in Diagrams for Scientific Publications Using Large Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19825/) (2025)
- [Decoding Scientific Experimental Images: The SPUR Benchmark for Perception, Understanding, and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.27604/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific figure quality is bound to the manuscript: a crop can be visually clear and still contradict its caption or the paragraph that cites it. Most image quality assessment and chart-understanding methods target a detached visual surface or a question-answering score, rather than alignment among the figure, its caption, and the citing text. A single end-to-end prompt that sees the image and the text together still mixes what is visible with what the caption and the citing paragraph claim, so fluent wording can raise a visual score and missing text can be treated as low quality. To address this gap, we introduce SciFigQual-Bench, a manuscript-linked benchmark for published CS-conference figures that binds each figure to its caption and to index-resolved citing paragraphs, and scores visual clarity, layout, caption consistency, context consistency, and misleading risk, leaving a dimension unevaluated when its evidence is absent. SFQ-Agent reads the image and the text in separate calls and records modality-specific evidence. A cross-modal judge scores caption and citing-text alignment from those reports, and a deterministic runner keeps the visual scores, sets misleading risk by a fixed rule, and applies the written caps, so each dimension follows the rubric instead of a single end-to-end prompt. Experiments comparing this staged judge with single-pass and OCR-sidecar protocols find the closest point-estimate fit to mean human ratings under staged judging, while the gap between protocols remains small. Caption consistency remains the main gap, and agreement with the rater mean answers a different question from agreement among human raters.