# SecRespond: Benchmarking AI Agents for Real-World Post-Compromise Incident Response

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.26791 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.26791/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 24 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15594/) (2024)
- [τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12045/) (2024)
- [OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07972/) (2024)
- [τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07982/) (2025)
- [Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11868/) (2026)
- [The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03218/) (2024)
- [SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12670/) (2026)
- [SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16941/) (2025)
- [Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08926/) (2024)
- [CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application Vulnerabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17332/) (2025)
- [NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05590/) (2024)
- [Claw-Eval: Towards Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.06132/) (2026)
- [CYBERSECEVAL 3: Advancing the Evaluation of Cybersecurity Risks and Capabilities in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01605/) (2024)
- [VitaBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents with Versatile Interactive Tasks in Real-world Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.26490/) (2025)
- [ClawBench: Can AI Agents Complete Everyday Online Tasks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08523/) (2026)
- [SecBench: A Comprehensive Multi-Dimensional Benchmarking Dataset for LLMs in Cybersecurity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.20787/) (2024)
- [ExCyTIn-Bench: Evaluating LLM agents on Cyber Threat Investigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14201/) (2025)
- [IRCopilot: Automated Incident Response with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20945/) (2025)
- [Claw-Eval-Live: A Live Agent Benchmark for Evolving Real-World Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.28139/) (2026)
- [CyberSOCEval: Benchmarking LLMs Capabilities for Malware Analysis and Threat Intelligence Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.20166/) (2025)
- [CocoaBench: Evaluating Unified Digital Agents in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.11201/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Coding Agents Aren't Enough! Evaluating an Enterprise Security Brain for Agentic Cloud Investigations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.30345/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly adopted in real-world security operations with access to host artifacts and command-line interfaces (CLIs), making it critical to thoroughly assess their security capabilities. However, existing cybersecurity benchmarks focus on pre-compromise settings where agents are placed in a clean and idealized environment before an attack occurs. This leaves the post-compromise setting underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce SecRespond, the first benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on the post-compromise incident-response workflow. Given a forensic disk snapshot of a compromised host together with the alerts, vulnerability scans, and baseline checks reported by a host security product, agents are required to produce forensic reports on intrusions, baseline risks, and vulnerability risks, together with a remediation plan. We instantiate this task across 10 cyber ranges, each constructed from a distinct compromised cloud host, spanning 4 entry-point types, 21 ATT&CK techniques, and 5 operating systems. We evaluate 23 frontier LLMs on the OpenCode agent harness. Experimental results show that although current agents can reliably uncover the problems exposed by alerts, they struggle to proactively investigate the disk for silent intrusions and to produce comprehensive, verified remediation plans, with no model achieving complete detection and remediation on any single range. This reveals a fundamental bottleneck in building agents for real-world incident response. The benchmark is publicly available at https://github.com/Alibaba-NLP/qqr/tree/main/data/secrespond.