# Flow Map Learning via Nongradient Vector Flow

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.26398 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.26398/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 33 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Flow matching, time series and science](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/flow-matching-time-series-and-science/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05233/) (2021)
- [Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03585/) (2015)
- [Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09748/) (2022)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03206/) (2024)
- [Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03003/) (2022)
- [Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00364/) (2022)
- [Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.05770/) (2015)
- [Consistency Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.01469/) (2023)
- [Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02762/) (2019)
- [Variational Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.00630/) (2021)
- [Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15571/) (2022)
- [Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08797/) (2023)
- [SiT: Exploring Flow and Diffusion-based Generative Models with Scalable Interpolant Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08740/) (2024)
- [Maximum Likelihood Training of Score-Based Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.09258/) (2021)
- [Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13447/) (2025)
- [Consistency Trajectory Models: Learning Probability Flow ODE Trajectory of Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02279/) (2023)
- [Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14189/) (2023)
- [Analyzing and Improving the Training Dynamics of Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02696/) (2023)
- [InstaFlow: One Step is Enough for High-Quality Diffusion-Based Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06380/) (2023)
- [Simplifying, Stabilizing and Scaling Continuous-Time Consistency Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11081/) (2024)
- [The Mechanics of n-Player Differentiable Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.05642/) (2018)
- [Inductive Moment Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07565/) (2025)
- [How to build a consistency model: Learning flow maps via self-distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18825/) (2025)
- [Align Your Flow: Scaling Continuous-Time Flow Map Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14603/) (2025)
- [Probability flow solution of the Fokker-Planck equation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04642/) (2022)
- [Neural Flow Diffusion Models: Learnable Forward Process for Improved Diffusion Modelling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12940/) (2024)
- [Where to Diffuse, How to Diffuse, and How to Get Back: Automated Learning for Multivariate Diffusions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07261/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [How I learned to stop worrying and love StopGrads: Stationarity, Convergence, and a case study on Flow Map Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.16222/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Diffusion and flow-based models benefit from simple regression losses, but inference incurs significant overhead because sampling requires integration. Consistency models address this by directly learning the flow maps along the ODE trajectory, opening a design space between one-step and many-step approaches. However, existing methods face computational challenges such as requiring model inverses or backpropagation through iterated model calls, and do not always prove that the desired ODE flow map is a solution to the loss. We introduce SGFlow, an approach for learning flow maps that bypasses explicit invertibility constraints and expensive differentiation through model iteration. SGFlow trains a model to compute both the ODE solutions and the implied velocity from scratch by following non-conservative dynamics with a stationary point at the desired flow map. On the CIFAR image benchmark, no single method attains the best FID at every step count: SGFlow attains the best FID at 10 sampling steps and remains competitive with flow matching, Meanflow, and Lagrangian map matching at other step counts, while being the only one with a proven stationary-point guarantee for its stopgrad-based dynamics.