# Seeing or Knowing? Visual Context Sensitivity in Multimodal Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.26326 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.26326/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 52 of its 60 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [MLLM training and visual instruction tuning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/mllm-training-and-visual-instruction-tuning/)
- Mechanistic interpretability / [Interpreting vision and multimodal models](https://mlsanity.com/mechinterp/interpreting-vision-and-multimodal-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 52)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12597/) (2023)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14198/) (2022)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6114/) (2013)
- [Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15343/) (2023)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01405/) (2023)
- [SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14786/) (2025)
- [Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00593/) (2022)
- [Qwen-Image Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02324/) (2025)
- [Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10248/) (2023)
- [SAM 3: Segment Anything with Concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.16719/) (2025)
- [Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16860/) (2024)
- [Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07646/) (2022)
- [Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06209/) (2024)
- [Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16922/) (2023)
- [V*: Guided Visual Search as a Core Mechanism in Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14135/) (2023)
- [DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03883/) (2023)
- [Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05052/) (2021)
- [Diffusion Transformers with Representation Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11690/) (2025)
- [Gemma 4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02770/) (2026)
- [Transfer between Modalities with MetaQueries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.06256/) (2025)
- [Finding Alignments Between Interpretable Causal Variables and Distributed Neural Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.02536/) (2023)
- [MetaMorph: Multimodal Understanding and Generation via Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14164/) (2024)
- [Building and better understanding vision-language models: insights and future directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.12637/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance by integrating visual inputs with the rich priors of pretrained language models. However, they often fail on vision-centric tasks, especially when visual evidence conflicts with pretrained knowledge. We explore these failures separately using two diagnostic paradigms: (1) probing whether visual information is available, via image reconstruction, and (2) measuring multimodal context sensitivity, the extent to which the model follows visual context versus the language prior. To support the second, we introduce the WhatIfVis, a benchmark spanning five coarse-grained dimensions (spatial-temporal, color, count, size, and weight) whose questions admit answers from either the image or the prior. Our analysis yields three findings: (i) Coarse-grained visual evidence is preserved, as these attributes can be reconstructed from the final-layer image tokens of frozen MLLMs. Failures on questions about these attributes therefore point to post-perceptual utilization, rather than to degraded visual encoding during perception. (ii) Even when explicitly instructed to use or ignore visual evidence, vanilla models (without supervised fine-tuning on the WhatIfVis) show unstable visual context sensitivity. Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) improves this controllability and generalizes across domains, and activation patching further localizes the vision-versus-prior trade-off at architecture-specific depths across all six models. (iii) The vision-versus-prior trade-off is controllable along a learned vector. Applying this steering vector, even without any intent instruction, improves controllability over the vanilla model. Together, these results relocate the bottleneck, indicating that for the coarse attributes we study, MLLMs encode the visual evidence but cannot reliably control their reliance on it.