# Characterizing Human-Likeness in AI Generated Poetry: A Zero-shot Classification Study

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.26221 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.26221/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 13 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11305/) (2023)
- [Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09203/) (2019)
- [Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05130/) (2023)
- [Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12070/) (2024)
- [MERMAID: Metaphor Generation with Symbolism and Discriminative Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06779/) (2021)
- [Evaluating Diversity in Automatic Poetry Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15267/) (2024)
- [GenAI Content Detection Task 3: Cross-Domain Machine-Generated Text Detection Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.08913/) (2025)
- [POEMetric: The Last Stanza of Humanity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03695/) (2026)
- [Seeing the Poem: Image-Semantic Detection of AI-Generated Modern Chinese Poetry with MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.22654/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the advancement of AI technologies, Generative AI (GenAI) and human written text have become nearly indistinguishable. Additionally, the global standardization of AI chatbots made academic malpractice more frequent. Furthermore, existing research indicates GenAI poems are the most difficult to distinguish even without any modification thus, GenAI poems are naturally deemed human-like by modern detectors. However, the objectivity of such dissertations needs to be verified against modern detection tools but the subjectivity of poetry and the black-box nature of the modern LLMs (Large Language Models) architectures made verification of such work quite complicated. Hence, the main objective of the research is to deduce the attributes of English poetry that contribute classification and misclassification of both human and AI poems and provide corroborating or contradicting evidence to the poetry distinguishability claim. For such characterizations, we propose a Zero-shot detection pipeline with a dataset consisting of both human and AI poems to verify the distinguishability of human and AI creation and extract the aforementioned crucial attributes for accurate classification. Extraction of such attributes provides benefits in two ways: firstly, it reduces the margin of training needed as only the poems based on misclassifying attributes need to be trained and fine tuned and finally provides a critical insight to the GenAI detection dilemma to strengthen the modern detection pipelines.