# CoTinyVLA: Chain-of-Thought Distillation for a Sub-Billion-Parameter Vision-Language-Action Model

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25487 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.25487/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 36 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Spatial and embodied reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/spatial-and-embodied-reasoning/)
- Vision-language-action models / [Reasoning and chain-of-thought in VLA](https://mlsanity.com/vla/reasoning-and-chain-of-thought-in-vla/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09246/) (2024)
- [π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24164/) (2024)
- [RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06817/) (2022)
- [π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16054/) (2025)
- [LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03310/) (2023)
- [GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14734/) (2025)
- [Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models: Optimizing Speed and Success](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19645/) (2025)
- [EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.11196/) (2019)
- [Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02301/) (2023)
- [FAST: Efficient Action Tokenization for Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.09747/) (2025)
- [SmolVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for Affordable and Efficient Robotics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01844/) (2025)
- [SpatialVLA: Exploring Spatial Representations for Visual-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.15830/) (2025)
- [UniVLA: Learning to Act Anywhere with Task-centric Latent Actions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.06111/) (2025)
- [WorldVLA: Towards Autoregressive Action World Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21539/) (2025)
- [Robotic Control via Embodied Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.08693/) (2024)
- [TinyVLA: Towards Fast, Data-Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12514/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models Are Reasoning Teachers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10071/) (2022)
- [LIBERO-Plus: In-depth Robustness Analysis of Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13626/) (2025)
- [Interactive Post-Training for Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17016/) (2025)
- [NORA: A Small Open-Sourced Generalist Vision Language Action Model for Embodied Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.19854/) (2025)
- [GraspVLA: a Grasping Foundation Model Pre-trained on Billion-scale Synthetic Action Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03233/) (2025)
- [Universal Actions for Enhanced Embodied Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.10105/) (2025)
- [4D-VLA: Spatiotemporal Vision-Language-Action Pretraining with Cross-Scene Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.22242/) (2025)
- [VLA-0: Building State-of-the-Art VLAs with Zero Modification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13054/) (2025)
- [Evo-1: Lightweight Vision-Language-Action Model with Preserved Semantic Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.04555/) (2025)
- [ParaBank: Monolingual Bitext Generation and Sentential Paraphrasing via Lexically-constrained Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.03644/) (2019)
- [VLA-OS: Structuring and Dissecting Planning Representations and Paradigms in Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17561/) (2025)
- [NORA-1.5: A Vision-Language-Action Model Trained using World Model- and Action-based Preference Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.14659/) (2025)
- [SwiftVLA: Unlocking Spatiotemporal Dynamics for Lightweight VLA Models at Minimal Overhead](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.00903/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models translate natural-language commands into robot action sequences, but leading systems on the LIBERO-Plus robustness benchmark use three- to seven-billion-parameter backbones whose memory demands can exceed embedded robotic budgets. We present CoTinyVLA, a 0.9B-parameter action model on a Qwen3.5-0.8B backbone that obtains that robustness by structuring supervision instead of enlarging the model. Three components target different axes of the problem: dual-view temporal input of 16 history frames per step with textual camera and time markers; hierarchical chain-of-thought (CoT) distillation from a 35B teacher into an episode-level Plan and a chunk-level Think span over task phase, gripper state and next subaction; and paraphrase augmentation expanding 40 base commands into 800 variants. On LIBERO-Plus, spanning 10,030 perturbed tasks across seven perturbation dimensions, CoTinyVLA reaches 90.8% on Spatial, 87.3% on Object, 86.6% on Goal and 80.7% on Long, leading the strongest 7B baseline on all four suites by 4.7, 2.8, 15.9 and 3.0 points, with every margin interval excluding zero. The gains concentrate on the hardest axes of the benchmark: across the eleven published baselines none exceeds 53.2% on Robot Initial States in any suite, whereas CoTinyVLA reaches 73.6% on Goal against 39.9% for the strongest baseline. Ablations show the three components to be separable by perturbation axis, and at a matched image budget how frames are divided between the two cameras and across time accounts for 8.6 points on its own. Closed-loop inference peaks at 2.25 GiB of allocated GPU memory, and paired interventions show the episode Plan to be load-bearing: replacing it with an empty or contradictory span costs 40 to 45 points of success. Structured supervision thus lets a 0.9B backbone exceed all of them. Code: https://github.com/BrainJellyPie/CoTinyVLA