# Calibrated Tree-Neural Fusion for Fine-Grained Vegetation Community Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24160 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.24160/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 72 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.00567/) (2015)
- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02142/) (2015)
- [Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.05175/) (2017)
- [Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.09406/) (2017)
- [Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11959/) (2021)
- [TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.06678/) (2020)
- [Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06312/) (2019)
- [Deep Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification: An Overview](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12861/) (2019)
- [A Survey: Deep Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification with Few Labeled Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.01800/) (2021)
- [LiDAR-Guided Cross-Attention Fusion for Hyperspectral Band Selection and Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03883/) (2024)
- [Improvement in Land Cover and Crop Classification based on Temporal Features Learning from Sentinel-2 Data Using Recurrent-Convolutional Neural Network (R-CNN)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.12880/) (2020)
- [Continental-scale land cover mapping at 10 m resolution over Europe (ELC10)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.10922/) (2021)
- [Lidar-based Norwegian tree species detection using deep learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06066/) (2023)
- [Tree species classification at the pixel-level using deep learning and multispectral time series in an imbalanced context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08887/) (2024)
- [Hyperspectral and LiDAR data classification based on linear self-attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.02301/) (2021)
- [HSLiNets: Evaluating Band Ordering Strategies in Hyperspectral and LiDAR Fusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21072/) (2025)
- [Unsupervised Band Selection Using Fused HSI and LiDAR Attention Integrating With Autoencoder](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05258/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate vegetation-community classification is essential for ecological monitoring, habitat assessment, and evidence-based environmental management in heterogeneous landscapes. Existing studies often rely on standalone tree ensembles or generic neural networks, although fine-grained ecological classes frequently exhibit overlapping spectral, topographic, and structural characteristics. Many frameworks also provide limited protection against stacking leakage, insufficient probability calibration, weak minority-class evaluation, and little evidence of stability across repeated data splits. To address these limitations, this study proposes Calibrated EcoTreeFuseNet-Plus, a tree-neural probability-fusion framework that combines out-of-fold tree probabilities, EcoFuseNet-V2 outputs, validation-selected meta-learning, and post-hoc temperature scaling. Raster values from six LiDAR-derived terrain and canopy variables and two hyperspectral vegetation indices were extracted at coordinate-based reference locations. Quality control removed 26 samples with missing elevation and one sample with non-finite NDWI, producing 1,833 complete records across 29 vegetation and non-vegetation classes. On the held-out test set, the proposed model achieved an accuracy of 0.8000, a macro F1-score of 0.7768, a balanced accuracy of 0.7903, and an MCC of 0.7903. Calibration reduced the expected calibration error from 0.3866 to 0.0651 without changing class predictions. Five-seed evaluation yielded a macro F1-score of 0.7717 +/- 0.0112, indicating stable performance across repeated splits. The results demonstrate a reliable discrimination-calibration trade-off for small-sample, fine-grained ecological classification.