# LabRobFail: A Benchmark for Robotic Failure Analysis in Chemical Self-driving Laboratory

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23704 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.23704/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Large language models for driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving.
- Builds on 22 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- End-to-end autonomous driving / [Large language models for driving](https://mlsanity.com/driving/large-language-models-for-driving/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05530/) (2024)
- [RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15818/) (2023)
- [OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09246/) (2024)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16054/) (2025)
- [Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05271/) (2024)
- [Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13705/) (2023)
- [RLBench: The Robot Learning Benchmark & Learning Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12271/) (2019)
- [BridgeData V2: A Dataset for Robot Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12952/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models for Advanced Multimodal Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10302/) (2024)
- [3D-VLA: A 3D Vision-Language-Action Generative World Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09631/) (2024)
- [REFLECT: Summarizing Robot Experiences for Failure Explanation and Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15724/) (2023)
- [AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.00371/) (2024)
- [Learning to Model the World with Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01399/) (2023)
- [Code-as-Monitor: Constraint-aware Visual Programming for Reactive and Proactive Robotic Failure Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04455/) (2024)
- [DoReMi: Grounding Language Model by Detecting and Recovering from Plan-Execution Misalignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.00329/) (2023)
- [RoboFAC: A Comprehensive Framework for Robotic Failure Analysis and Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12224/) (2025)
- [ARMBench: An Object-centric Benchmark Dataset for Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16382/) (2023)
- [AutoBio: A Simulation and Benchmark for Robotic Automation in Digital Biology Laboratory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14030/) (2025)
- [LabUtopia: High-Fidelity Simulation and Hierarchical Benchmark for Scientific Embodied Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22634/) (2025)
- [Diagnose, Correct, and Learn from Manipulation Failures via Visual Symbols](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02787/) (2025)
- [A Multimodal Handover Failure Detection Dataset and Baselines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18319/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The deployment of embodied agents in self-driving laboratories could accelerate scientific discovery, yet their reliability is constrained by the irreversible and safety-critical nature of chemical experiments. Progress is further hindered by scarce failure data and the lack of fine-grained evaluation protocols. To address these challenges, we introduce LabRobFail, a failure-centric framework for learning and evaluating robotic failure analysis in chemical laboratories. LabRobFail-Sim injects controllable failures at the control, physics, and semantic levels, enabling the construction of LabRobFail-Data, which contains over 20,000 trajectories across 70+ task scenarios, five failure categories, and 11 fine-grained failure types. LabRobFail-Bench evaluates six capabilities spanning task understanding, failure detection, temporal localization, severity assessment, failure classification, and actionable correction. We further develop LabRobFail-VLM, a domain-specialized vision-language model that generates structured failure diagnoses and recovery instructions. On seen environments, it achieves 90.83% failure-detection accuracy and 77.21% temporal-localization accuracy, substantially outperforming general-purpose VLMs. When integrated as a real-time supervisor, it improves downstream task success rates by 4-16 percentage points, demonstrating the value of fine-grained failure understanding for closed-loop recovery and reliable laboratory autonomy. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/Su-ISE-2001/SciRobo