# Small-Pollinator Detection in Cluttered Field Video

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22913 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.22913/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 15 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.12872/) (2020)
- [DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.03605/) (2022)
- [Flow-Guided Feature Aggregation for Video Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.10025/) (2017)
- [Slicing Aided Hyper Inference and Fine-tuning for Small Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06934/) (2022)
- [Sequence Level Semantics Aggregation for Video Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.06390/) (2019)
- [TransVOD: End-to-End Video Object Detection with Spatial-Temporal Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05047/) (2022)
- [RF-DETR: Neural Architecture Search for Real-Time Detection Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.09554/) (2025)
- [QueryDet: Cascaded Sparse Query for Accelerating High-Resolution Small Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.09136/) (2021)
- [Ultralytics YOLO26: Unified Real-Time End-to-End Vision Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03748/) (2026)
- [HRDNet: High-resolution Detection Network for Small Objects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07607/) (2020)
- [Spatial Monitoring and Insect Behavioural Analysis Using Computer Vision for Precision Pollination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.04675/) (2022)
- [Enhancing Pollinator Conservation towards Agriculture 4.0: Monitoring of Bees through Object Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15428/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Detecting pollinators in field video is challenging: targets are small, visually similar, and observed against cluttered vegetation under blur and occlusion. We present a systematic empirical study of small-pollinator detection under a practical single-GPU compute budget. Using the BuzzSpot challenge dataset, we compare YOLO and RF-DETR models across input resolutions and evaluate sliced inference, class-gated fusion, size-routed ensembling, and post-hoc temporal processing. RF-DETR Large at 1344-pixel resolution achieved our best hidden-test result, reaching 0.405 mAP50:95 and outperforming the 1120-pixel model (0.379) and the best single-model YOLO26m baseline (0.366). The strongest gains came from adopting RF-DETR and increasing its input resolution, indicating that detector choice and input resolution were more effective levers than added inference-time complexity; the resolution gain was strongest for small objects and the rarer bumblebee and moth classes. Sliced-inference fusion, size-routed ensembling, and warm-started 1536-pixel continuation did not surpass this result, while post-hoc temporal processing did not improve the leaked diagnostic evaluation. Error analysis identified bee-hoverfly discrimination as the clearest remaining bottleneck: neighboring frames rarely supplied correctly classified hoverfly evidence for post-hoc correction. These findings motivate learned feature-level temporal aggregation before the final classification decision.