# CRAFT: Learn the Schema, Execute the Plan

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22642 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.22642/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 19 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08887/) (2018)
- [API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08244/) (2023)
- [Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08491/) (2023)
- [DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11015/) (2023)
- [TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.02349/) (2020)
- [RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parsers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04942/) (2019)
- [Spider 2.0: Evaluating Language Models on Real-World Enterprise Text-to-SQL Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07763/) (2024)
- [CoSQL: A Conversational Text-to-SQL Challenge Towards Cross-Domain Natural Language Interfaces to Databases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.05378/) (2019)
- [Semantic Evaluation for Text-to-SQL with Distilled Test Suites](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02840/) (2020)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning for LLM Multi-Step Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16145/) (2024)
- [Never Lost in the Middle: Mastering Long-Context Question Answering with Position-Agnostic Decompositional Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09198/) (2023)
- [Multi-Agent-as-Judge: Aligning LLM-Agent-Based Automated Evaluation with Multi-Dimensional Human Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.21028/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Enterprise coding agents translate natural-language analytical requests into executable code over proprietary APIs, schemas, and metric definitions. Yet the prevailing deployment pattern injecting exhaustive schema and tool documentation into each prompt increases inference overhead, complicates schema evolution, and undermines reliability in multi-turn analysis. We investigate whether stable schema knowledge and tool-use behavior can instead be acquired through post-training while preserving the consistency required for production-facing analytics. We present CRAFT, a two-stage post-training recipe for schema-grounded coding agents. First, schema-stripped PLAN supervised fine-tuning learns domain-structured plans and executable behaviors from validated trajectories without exhaustive prompt-time schema injection. Second, execution-shaped reinforcement learning aligns the policy for tool selection, code quality, plan-code consistency, and recovery from failed executions. Training trajectories are curated through a Tri-Gate filter combining execution validation, data-integrity checks, and LLM-judge reasoning audit. We evaluate CRAFT for planned rollout in advertising analytics, covering campaign performance analysis, metric drill-downs, entity-level performance analysis, and multi-turn analytical refinement. The enterprise evaluation environment incorporates beta APIs as the agent-facing tool surface and spans 25 schema-linked core entities and 30 agentic workflows. Relative to a schema-stuffed baseline, CRAFT improves composite Agent Score by +9.6 pp, consistency by +4.1 pp, and multi-turn coherence by +4.2 pp, while reducing input-token burden by approximately 9x and schema-discovery loops by up to 5x. We further report deployment tradeoffs, reward-shaping limitations, and training-infrastructure extensions required for multi-turn tool-use reinforcement learning in enterprise settings.