# DeepLens Diagnosis Agent: Agentic Workflow Design Lets a Small Reasoning Model Compete with Frontier LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22555 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.22555/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Clinical and biomedical applications, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 10 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Clinical and biomedical applications](https://mlsanity.com/lr/clinical-and-biomedical-applications/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Medical and scientific domain agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/medical-and-scientific-domain-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03629/) (2022)
- [Augmented Language Models: a Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07842/) (2023)
- [Can Generalist Foundation Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16452/) (2023)
- [DiagnosisArena: Benchmarking Diagnostic Reasoning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14107/) (2025)
- [OctoMed: Data Recipes for State-of-the-Art Multimodal Medical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.23269/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Medical diagnosis is a multi-stage process: extract facts, consult knowledge, generate a differential analysis, and select the best diagnosis with explanations. Frontier LLMs are strong generalists, but single-shot prompting often yields brittle diagnostic reasoning. We present the DeepLens Diagnosis Agent, a five-stage harnessing pipeline (combining model capabilities with disciplined process constraints) centered on a small medical reasoning model (JSL Medical Small 7B v2) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). The pipeline enforces structured clinical extraction, disciplined retrieval, constrained candidate generation, explicit evidence triangulation, and an auditable final decision. On the 915-case DiagnosisArena benchmark, the agent achieved 60.14% top-1 diagnostic accuracy, the highest among small and medium-sized models. The same model without the agent workflow achieved 23.99%, a +36-point gain from workflow design alone, despite 88.2% on standard medical benchmarks, showing that diagnostic reasoning under uncertainty requires more than knowledge recall. The agent costs USD 0.0072 per case (24K tokens on A100) with 24-second latency, 35-45% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5 (USD 0.0110) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (USD 0.0128) while outperforming them by +9.70pp and +9.17pp. Harnessing can also correct frontier model failures; workflow constraints can outweigh parameter count or API cost. Beyond aggregate accuracy, the pipeline produces structured intermediate artifacts that make each stage inspectable and support error localization. These properties support high-stakes settings where traceability, reproducibility, and auditable evidence matter alongside benchmark performance.