# IDEAgent: Agentic Quality-Diversity Search for Research Idea Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22375 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.22375/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 16 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06292/) (2024)
- [Illuminating search spaces by mapping elites](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1504.04909/) (2015)
- [The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08066/) (2025)
- [Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientist](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18864/) (2025)
- [ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07738/) (2024)
- [Robots that can adapt like animals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1407.3501/) (2014)
- [Chain of Ideas: Revolutionizing Research Via Novel Idea Development with LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13185/) (2024)
- [Differentiable Quality Diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03894/) (2021)
- [AI Research Agents for Machine Learning: Search, Exploration, and Generalization in MLE-bench](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02554/) (2025)
- [Many Heads Are Better Than One: Improved Scientific Idea Generation by A LLM-Based Multi-Agent System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09403/) (2024)
- [Quality-Diversity through AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13032/) (2023)
- [SoundnessBench: Can Your AI Scientist Really Tell Good Research Ideas from Bad Ones?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30329/) (2026)
- [Exploring Design of Multi-Agent LLM Dialogues for Research Ideation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.08350/) (2025)
- [What Does It Take to Be a Good AI Research Agent? Studying the Role of Ideation Diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.15593/) (2025)
- [On the Limits of LLM-as-Judge for Scientific Novelty Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12071/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [ShadowMiner v1 - An Experience Report on Implementing and Measuring a Problem-and-Hypothesis Discovery Engine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.04339/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly automated the process of scientific discovery over the past few years. However, existing systems share one core limitation: they generate and optimize ideas independently for either Quality or Diversity. This often leads to the generation of ideas in close proximity to one another or to a large set of trivial, unsound, or unclear concepts. In this work, we instead argue that research ideation should be treated as a conjunction of both objectives and framed as a Quality-Diversity (QD) search. In line with this perspective, we introduce IDEAgent, a multi-agent framework that manages the evolution of ideas through lineages. We jointly drive Quality using multi-objective feedback for dedicated repair and refinement, while Diversity is achieved through lightweight sequential memory and explicit comparison against completed ideas, their historical ancestors, and rejected proposals. To systematically evaluate this QD conjunction, we develop Yield, a joint metric that computes the largest set of mutually diverse ideas that satisfy a predetermined quality threshold. Finally, through evaluations across 32 topics spanning 8 domains of Computer Science, we show that IDEAgent outperforms the best baseline by 3.89x on Yield, while achieving non-zero Yield on 8x more topics. We further corroborate these findings through an analysis of quality improvements, showing that repair and refinement are crucial for building logical rigor and clarity while preserving non-obviousness. To encourage future research on QD-search-based ideation, we open-source IDEAgent at https://github.com/declare-lab/IDEAgent.