# Latent PDE mapping for efficient physics-informed learning across geometries with limited data

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22215 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.22215/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.10974/) (2021)
- [Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05209/) (2022)
- [Geometry-Informed Neural Operator for Large-Scale 3D PDEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00583/) (2023)
- [PhyGeoNet: Physics-Informed Geometry-Adaptive Convolutional Neural Networks for Solving Parameterized Steady-State PDEs on Irregular Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.13145/) (2020)
- [Physics-Informed Deep Neural Operator Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05748/) (2022)
- [Meshless physics-informed deep learning method for three-dimensional solid mechanics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.01547/) (2020)
- [Physics-Informed Geometry-Aware Neural Operator](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01600/) (2024)
- [Physics-Informed Latent Neural Operator for Real-time Predictions of time-dependent parametric PDEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.08428/) (2025)
- [A bi-atrial statistical shape model for large-scale in silico studies of human atria: model development and application to ECG simulations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.10838/) (2021)
- [LatentPINNs: Generative physics-informed neural networks via a latent representation learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07671/) (2023)
- [Physics-informed neural networks for transformed geometries and manifolds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.15940/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this study, we introduce latent PDE mapping, a broadly applicable physics-informed learning technique designed to enable efficient geometric generalization with sparse training data. Latent PDE mapping pulls back geometry-specific PDE residuals and boundary conditions to a predefined latent geometry via the deformation gradient, thereby enabling the automated calculation of geometry-consistent shape gradients that are missing in conventional physics-informed machine learning formulations. We demonstrate the utility of latent PDE mapping in solving the anisotropic Aliev-Panfilov PDE of cardiac electrophysiology using both physics-informed neural networks and physics-informed deep operator networks. The Aliev-Panfilov PDE serves as a challenging exemplar: a nonlinear, time-dependent PDE benchmark with sharp gradients that are expensive to capture using traditional numerical solvers. To represent the limited data regime, we train the networks using just fifteen geometric samples drawn from parameterized distributions in two and three spatial dimensions. While modest improvements appear for geometries parameterized by affine and shear deformations, latent PDE mapping demonstrates significant benefits on select geometric families, achieving a factor ~4-6 reduction in mean relative L2 error. Furthermore, our results show that the computational cost of applying latent PDE mapping was modest during network training, and negligible at inference. Taken together, our study highlights how latent PDE mapping facilitates the creation of generalizable physics-informed machine learning models from limited sets of training geometries.