# Tencent WorkBuddy Bench: A Multi-Domain Coding-Agent Benchmark with Contamination-Resistant Task Construction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20911 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.20911/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 15 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [RepoBench: Benchmarking Repository-Level Code Auto-Completion Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03091/) (2023)
- [InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14898/) (2023)
- [Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08926/) (2024)
- [CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application Vulnerabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17332/) (2025)
- [NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05590/) (2024)
- [OdysseyBench: Evaluating LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Complex Office Application Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09124/) (2025)
- [Interaction2Code: Benchmarking MLLM-based Interactive Webpage Code Generation from Interactive Prototyping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.03292/) (2024)
- [ClawsBench: Evaluating Capability and Safety of LLM Productivity Agents in Simulated Workspaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05172/) (2026)
- [Workspace-Bench 1.0: Benchmarking AI Agents on Workspace Tasks with Large-Scale File Dependencies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.03596/) (2026)
- [FrontendBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Front-End Development via Automatic Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13832/) (2025)
- [SpreadsheetBench 2: Evaluating Agents on End-to-End Business Spreadsheet Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.29955/) (2026)
- [Vibe Code Bench: Evaluating AI Models on End-to-End Web Application Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.04601/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Memory Control Signals Emerge Before Action in Long Horizon Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.27286/) (2026)
- [StateComp: Learning When to Compress History in Long Horizon Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.27298/) (2026)
- [Raven: The Harness of Harnesses for Composable Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33439/) (2026)
- [Stable Geometry with Divergent Task Evidence for Efficient Long-Horizon Agent Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.27332/) (2026)
- [VeriHarness: Scaling Agentic Verification for Long-Horizon Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00972/) (2026)
- [Harness^2: Recursive Agent Harnessing for an Open World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14224/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce Tencent WorkBuddy Bench, a multi-domain evaluation suite for coding agents; this report documents its construction methodology, scoring protocol, and a cross-model leaderboard. At its core is a unified evaluation framework for constructing and running distribution-informed coding-agent tasks across four work domains - Code, Web, Office, and Security. Rather than adapting public issue text, every task is reverse-engineered from a real commit, pull request, or business scenario and rewritten as a short, colloquial, role-played request, so that a task's prompt is not recoverable by web-searching the underlying issue, pull request, or commit thread. Because the dataset is released openly - task directories, environment images, evaluation harness, tests, and reference solutions - contamination resistance rests on this construction together with dataset versioning rather than on secrecy. The four subsets - repository-level engineering, front-end development, office and business workflows, and red-/blue-team security - probe complementary facets of real work, each with its own verification style. All are packaged in a uniform task-directory format and run, under a uniform and reproducible protocol, on two agent harnesses (CodeBuddy Code and Claude Code); the full open release makes the benchmark reproducible end to end and directly auditable, since any third party can re-run each task and inspect its content. Because each subset uses a different scoring instrument, scores are not comparable across subsets and the suite reports no suite-wide average. We report a cross-model leaderboard across several model families.