# Test-Time Training for Modality Order Consistency in Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20351 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.20351/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 27 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12597/) (2023)
- [Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14198/) (2022)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06500/) (2023)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14238/) (2023)
- [Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01134/) (2021)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05557/) (2022)
- [Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09690/) (2021)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.07396/) (2016)
- [MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03117/) (2022)
- [Object Hallucination in Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02156/) (2018)
- [Language Is Not All You Need: Aligning Perception with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14045/) (2023)
- [MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.09506/) (2021)
- [State of What Art? A Call for Multi-Prompt LLM Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.00595/) (2023)
- [Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07522/) (2022)
- [Causal Mediation Analysis for Interpreting Neural NLP: The Case of Gender Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.12265/) (2020)
- [Words or Vision: Do Vision-Language Models Have Blind Faith in Text?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02199/) (2025)
- [Same Task, Different Circuits: Disentangling Modality-Specific Mechanisms in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09047/) (2025)
- [Test-Time Consistency in Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.22395/) (2025)
- [Flip-Flop Consistency: Unsupervised Training for Robustness to Prompt Perturbations in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14242/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We find that vision-language models are sensitive to a specific semantically irrelevant change: the order in which the image and question are presented. Across three models and three benchmarks, image first prompting consistently outperforms question-first prompting, revealing a repeatable modality order failure. We use this gap to design an order-consistent test-time training method. Our method substantially closes the modality-order gap across all evaluated settings. Surprisingly, it also yields consistent improvements in the stronger image-first branch over the baseline, hence bootstrapping both orderings toward mutual consistency. Activation patching localizes the ordering failure to a narrow mid-network region where representations diverge sharply between prompt orders. We find that the test-time training method repairs this misalignment across layers. Together, our results identify modality-order sensitivity as a circuit-level failure in VLMs and demonstrate that simple, asymmetric test-time adaptation can effectively mitigate it and even improve performance over the baseline.