# ENTRAP-VL: A Taxonomic Probe for Dual Contextual Entrainment in Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20092 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.20092/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00093/) (2023)
- [Object Hallucination in Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02156/) (2018)
- [Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05052/) (2021)
- [Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Revealing the Behavior of Large Language Models in Knowledge Conflicts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13300/) (2023)
- [Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14739/) (2023)
- [Enhancing Noise Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Language Models with Adaptive Adversarial Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20978/) (2024)
- [Insight Over Sight: Exploring the Vision-Knowledge Conflicts in Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08145/) (2024)
- [What Do VLMs NOTICE? A Mechanistic Interpretability Pipeline for Gaussian-Noise-free Text-Image Corruption and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16320/) (2024)
- [Context versus Prior Knowledge in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04633/) (2024)
- [Have the VLMs Lost Confidence? A Study of Sycophancy in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11302/) (2024)
- [Losing Visual Needles in Image Haystacks: Vision Language Models are Easily Distracted in Short and Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16851/) (2024)
- [The Expense of Seeing: Attaining Trustworthy Multimodal Reasoning Within the Monolithic Paradigm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.20665/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Contextual entrainment is the tendency of a model to let auxiliary context in its input pull its output, independently of whether that context is relevant, true, or even meaningful. Recently, it has been identified and given a mechanistic account in unimodal language models. Whether and how it manifests in vision-language models (VLMs) is, by contrast, largely unexamined, and the field lacks a purpose-built instrument with which to investigate it. We take the position that studying contextual entrainment in VLMs requires more than porting an existing text-only benchmark to the multimodal setting: it requires a taxonomically structured, dual-modality instrument whose conditions are constructed around the item at hand (the depicted image in the textual stream, the textual query in the visual stream). We argue that the move to VLMs is substantive rather than incremental. It makes entrainment a dual phenomenon, drivable independently by textual and by visual context, and it opens a veracity distinction (context that is false of the depicted scene yet possible in the world) that has no counterpart in the unimodal, world-knowledge-only formulation of prior work. To make this position concrete and actionable, we introduce ENTRAP-VL (ENTRainment Assessment Probe for Vision and Language), a manually curated dataset of 1,500 items across eight categories, organized by a taxonomy that spans two axes, i.e., the association of context with the item and its relationship to truth, and split into a textual-entrainment stream (eight context conditions) and a visual-entrainment stream (three context conditions). We do not claim to measure entrainment in any particular model; we provide the instrument, the taxonomy that motivates it, and the evaluation protocols it enables, so that the community can investigate the phenomenon rigorously. We will release the dataset and its documentation publicly.