# PPL-Factory: Task-Aware and Budget-Aware Data Selection from Language Modeling to Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18199 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.18199/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 22 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Pointer Sentinel Mixture Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.07843/) (2016)
- [Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04730/) (2017)
- [Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08633/) (2021)
- [Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.07075/) (2021)
- [LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04333/) (2024)
- [Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrievers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.07899/) (2021)
- [From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12032/) (2023)
- [GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00123/) (2021)
- [Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and Not Yet Learnt](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07137/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Data Selection for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16827/) (2024)
- [Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00530/) (2024)
- [Training Data Influence Analysis and Estimation: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04612/) (2022)
- [Perplexed by Perplexity: Perplexity-Based Data Pruning With Small Reference Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20541/) (2024)
- [Large-Scale Data Selection for Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01807/) (2025)
- [Instruction Fine-Tuning: Does Prompt Loss Matter?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13586/) (2024)
- [Improving Influence-based Instruction Tuning Data Selection for Balanced Learning of Diverse Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12147/) (2025)
- [Data Whisperer: Efficient Data Selection for Task-Specific LLM Fine-Tuning via Few-Shot In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12212/) (2025)
- [Efficient Data Selection at Scale via Influence Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19051/) (2025)
- [Influence Functions for Efficient Data Selection in Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06108/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Not all training samples contribute equally to large language model fine-tuning. Selecting informative training samples can reduce the computational cost while preserving downstream performance. Many existing data selection methods rely on indirect heuristics, such as data quality, diversity or reasoning trace length. However, the effectiveness of these fixed criteria is task-dependent and difficult to generalize across diverse downstream tasks. Perplexity-based data selection provides a simple and model-aware solution to estimate the sample difficulty, but existing approaches typically score the entire training sequence and ignore the difference in learning objectives of language modeling and reasoning tasks. In this paper, we propose PPL-Factory, a simple and interpretable data selection framework that combines task-aware perplexity-based scores and data budget-aware selection criteria. Experiments on GSM8K demonstrate that PPL-Factory outperforms other state-of-the-art data selection methods using only 1% of the training set. With 10% of the data, PPL-Factory exceeds full-data fine-tuning accuracy by 0.9 on GSM8K and 4.8 on MATH. Overall, our results demonstrate that task-aware and budget-aware perplexity-based selection provides an effective and applicable approach for efficient fine-tuning.