# GeneSpeak-FP: Target and Compound Retrieval from Observed Cell-Level Perturbation Signatures

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17671 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.17671/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 4 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [ChemBERTa: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pretraining for Molecular Property Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.09885/) (2020)
- [Predicting Cellular Responses to Novel Drug Perturbations at a Single-Cell Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.13545/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale single-cell perturbation atlases make it possible to ask an inverse question: given an observed transcriptional response, which annotated targets and compounds in a fixed library are most consistent with that response? We present model, a Transformer retrieval model for this closed-library setting. Each input is a cell-level perturbation signature formed by contrasting one treated cell with a cell-line-specific mean DMSO reference. The encoder maps the signature to a target-retrieval vector and a molecular-embedding vector, trained jointly with supervised target losses and structure--transcriptome alignment. We evaluate on Tahoe-100M conditions with mapped target annotations using a within-compound stratified 90/10 condition-pair split of 10,505 training and 1,168 validation drug--cell-line pairs. Because compounds and cell lines can occur in both partitions, the experiment measures held-out condition-pair retrieval rather than generalization to unseen compounds or cellular contexts. In a Monte Carlo evaluation over 38,400 sampled validation cells, model achieved target Recall@10 of 0.408 and Recall@20 of 0.544, together with compound Hit@1 of 0.129, Hit@10 of 0.343, and mean reciprocal rank of 0.205 over a 379-compound bank. A separate diagnostic evaluation produced nearly identical values for the main model and large gains over a random-vector control and post-hoc bag-of-genes controls. These results demonstrate that a single multi-task model can recover both mapped target annotations and recorded compound identities from observed cell-level responses in the evaluated Tahoe-100M closed-library setting. Generalization to unseen compounds and cellular contexts remains to be established.