# Signal-based Model Access Risk Analysis for AI System Operations Security

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16414 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.16414/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 29 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.02918/) (2019)
- [Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.02697/) (2016)
- [The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.07528/) (2015)
- [ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.03999/) (2017)
- [Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02943/) (2016)
- [Adversarial Patch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.09665/) (2017)
- [Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.08598/) (2018)
- [Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.04248/) (2017)
- [Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.00553/) (2018)
- [Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.03141/) (2017)
- [HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.02144/) (2019)
- [Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.02766/) (2018)
- [Efficient Decision-based Black-box Adversarial Attacks on Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.04433/) (2019)
- [AdvHat: Real-world adversarial attack on ArcFace Face ID system](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.08705/) (2019)
- [Prior Convictions: Black-Box Adversarial Attacks with Bandits and Priors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.07978/) (2018)
- [AutoZOOM: Autoencoder-based Zeroth Order Optimization Method for Attacking Black-box Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.11770/) (2018)
- [Data-Free Model Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.14779/) (2020)
- [QEBA: Query-Efficient Boundary-Based Blackbox Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14137/) (2020)
- [RayS: A Ray Searching Method for Hard-label Adversarial Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.12792/) (2020)
- [Towards Transferable Adversarial Attack against Deep Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05790/) (2020)
- [Copycat CNN: Stealing Knowledge by Persuading Confession with Random Non-Labeled Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.05476/) (2018)
- [On the Reconstruction of Face Images from Deep Face Templates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.00832/) (2017)
- [AdvFaces: Adversarial Face Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.05008/) (2019)
- [Face Reconstruction from Face Embeddings using Adapter to a Face Foundation Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.03960/) (2024)
- [Similarity-based Gray-box Adversarial Attack Against Deep Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.04011/) (2022)
- [Rethinking Impersonation and Dodging Attacks on Face Recognition Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08903/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Physical Adversarial Attacks against Face Recognition Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16317/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are now ubiquitous across domains such as security, finance, healthcare, consumer technology, and large-scale cloud services, where they process massive volumes of data and make consequential decisions daily. This widespread adoption has created a broad attack surface through which adversaries can manipulate, evade, extract information from, or otherwise subvert deployed models. Depending on system design and exposure, attackers may have very different forms of access: some observe only final decisions, while others receive confidence scores, intermediate representations, or even full model parameters. While previous surveys typically organize evasion attacks into white-box, gray-box, and black-box categories based on the attacker's knowledge of model internals (architecture, parameters, gradients), this taxonomy often conflates different deployment scenarios that provide vastly different output signals, all labeled as ``black-box'' despite enabling fundamentally different attack strategies. Understanding how evasion attack strategies adapt to the specific information signals returned by deployed systems is critical for organizations making procurement and deployment decisions. To address this gap, we introduce the Signal-based Model Access Risk Taxonomy (SMART), a deployment-oriented framework that classifies attacker access according to the nature and richness of the information signals available from deployed AI systems. Using this taxonomy, we provide a structured overview of evasion attacks across progressively richer levels of information exposure, highlighting how deployment interfaces influence attack capabilities and informing more secure AI deployment and procurement decisions.