# Hidden in Thought: Transferable Chain-of-Thought Artifacts Induce Harmful Behavior

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15286 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.15286/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 3 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)
- LLM safety and security / [Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails](https://mlsanity.com/safety/safety-alignment-refusal-and-guardrails/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11717/) (2024)
- [AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14387/) (2023)
- [Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06987/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Stealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.09867/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate whether harmful chain-of-thought (CoT) traces from compromised language models can transfer unsafe behaviour and be distilled into reusable jailbreak attacks. Using an emergent-misalignment organism and a refusal-ablated jailbroken organism, we transplant harmful CoTs into 29 open-source and 5 closed-source targets. Transferred traces raise harmful-response rates above 80% on the most vulnerable open-source models, while semantically mismatched CoTs fail entirely. LLooM concept mining identifies four recurring components of harmful reasoning: proceduralisation, ethical decoupling, evasion, and target--vulnerability framing. Distilling these patterns into reusable system prompts produces effective black-box jailbreaks, outperforming direct CoT transplantation on strongly aligned models by up to an order of magnitude, including a 10× improvement on GPT-4.1 AdvBench. Reasoning-enabled models are more than twice as vulnerable, and output-side safeguards such as Llama-Guard~3 frequently miss harmful generations. Our results show that harmful reasoning transfers at both the trace and pattern levels, motivating defences that evaluate reasoning context in addition to final outputs.
