# Long-Context Fine-Tuning with Limited VRAM

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15105 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.15105/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 10 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awareness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14135/) (2022)
- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [Compressive Transformers for Long-Range Sequence Modelling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05507/) (2019)
- [LongLoRA: Efficient Fine-tuning of Long-Context Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.12307/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning reduces model and optimizer memory, but dense attention still makes long training sequences expensive. We combine Hierarchical Global Attention (HGA) with segment-wise backpropagation and tiered KV storage. Only the active segment remains differentiable in VRAM; older KV is detached into RAM or NVMe, and HGA loads a bounded set of exact historical tokens for each query block. On Qwen3-8B with 4-bit QLoRA and PG19, dense training on a 16 GB Quadro RTX 5000 fits 2,048 tokens but fails at 4,096, whereas HGA reaches 16,384 tokens with 15.28 GB peak VRAM. Under evaluation the same adapter runs through 131,072 tokens on this card; VRAM is not constant but grows gently with the resident chunk summaries, so RAM and NVMe capacity set the practical limit beyond these lengths. At the shared 2K training length, HGA-trained and dense-trained adapters obtain 2.7405 and 2.7383 nat under the same dense-attention readout, while the stock model obtains 2.9541. At this boundary HGA training is already marginally faster (217.75 vs. 207.02 tokens/s), and the HGA-to-dense throughput ratio improves from 1K to 2K; because HGA keeps the attended historical set per token approximately constant while dense work per token grows, we expect this lead to widen as context grows. Dense attention is used for the main quality and retrieval comparisons so that they measure the learned weights and remain compatible with standard generation frameworks. HGA can also be used for retrieval and generation; an optimized production-grade serving implementation is under development.