# Alipay-PIBench: A Realistic Payment Integration Benchmark for Coding Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14573 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.14573/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09938/) (2021)
- [NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.12730/) (2025)
- [FEA-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Repository-Level Code Generation for Feature Implementation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06680/) (2025)
- [DeepSWE: Measuring Frontier Coding Agents on Original, Long-Horizon Engineering Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07946/) (2026)
- [BeyondSWE: Can Current Code Agent Survive Beyond Single-Repo Bug Fixing?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03194/) (2026)
- [ABench-Physics: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning in LLMs via High-Difficulty and Dynamic Physics Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.04766/) (2025)
- [ProjDevBench: Benchmarking AI Coding Agents on End-to-End Project Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.01655/) (2026)
- [Can LLM-as-a-Judge Reliably Verify Rubrics in Agentic Scenarios?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.29920/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Payment integration is a demanding repository-level software task: agents must select a suitable product, implement coordinated client-server flows, verify payment outcomes, and preserve consistency between transaction and business states. We introduce Alipay-PIBench, a benchmark for evaluating coding agents on realistic Alipay payment integration. It contains nine product-specific projects and 18 task instances, each organized into Basic functional-completion and Advanced risk-aware hardening scenarios. Scenario-specific rubrics support deterministic static, unit, integration, and end-to-end checks, supplemented by LLM-assisted assessment for semantic requirements. We evaluate six coding-agent models and report rubric pass rate (RPR). Under the with-skill condition, mean RPR ranges from 68.58% to 91.37%. Access to the alipay-payment-integration skill improves mean RPR by 10.31 percentage points on average relative to the without-skill condition, with gains varying across models, products, and scenarios. Method-level results distinguish source-level completion, executable payment behavior, and payment-domain requirements. Alipay-PIBench provides a controlled setting for diagnosing model capability and evaluating structured guidance in payment integration.
