# SafeRelBench: A Spatial-Relation-Aware Benchmark for Process-Level Safety in VLM-Driven Embodied Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14543 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.14543/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Embodied and 3D vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/embodied-and-3d-vision-language-models/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09246/) (2024)
- [Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.01201/) (2019)
- [Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05608/) (2022)
- [AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.05474/) (2017)
- [ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01734/) (2019)
- [VirtualHome: Simulating Household Activities via Programs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07011/) (2018)
- [VIMA: General Robot Manipulation with Multimodal Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03094/) (2022)
- [REVERIE: Remote Embodied Visual Referring Expression in Real Indoor Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.10151/) (2019)
- [EmbodiedGPT: Vision-Language Pre-Training via Embodied Chain of Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15021/) (2023)
- [TEACh: Task-driven Embodied Agents that Chat](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.00534/) (2021)
- [Aligning Cyber Space with Physical World: A Comprehensive Survey on Embodied AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06886/) (2024)
- [Physically Grounded Vision-Language Models for Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.02561/) (2023)
- [RoboSpatial: Teaching Spatial Understanding to 2D and 3D Vision-Language Models for Robotics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16537/) (2024)
- [SafeAgentBench: A Benchmark for Safe Task Planning of Embodied LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.13178/) (2024)
- [Housekeep: Tidying Virtual Households using Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10712/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Robotics with Foundation Models: toward Embodied AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02385/) (2024)
- [Visual Semantic Planning using Deep Successor Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.08080/) (2017)
- [IS-Bench: Evaluating Interactive Safety of VLM-Driven Embodied Agents in Daily Household Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.16402/) (2025)
- [A Framework for Benchmarking and Aligning Task-Planning Safety in LLM-Based Embodied Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14650/) (2025)
- [Subtle Risks, Critical Failures: A Framework for Diagnosing Physical Safety of LLMs for Embodied Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19933/) (2025)
- [Advancing Embodied Agent Security: From Safety Benchmarks to Input Moderation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15699/) (2025)
- [Grounding Object Relations in Language-Conditioned Robotic Manipulation with Semantic-Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17919/) (2023)
- [BeSafe-Bench: Unveiling Behavioral Safety Risks of Situated Agents in Functional Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25747/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Coding Agents with an Obstacle-Aware Harness for Safe Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.20822/) (2026)
- [RT-Safe: Benchmarking Agent Safety in Real-Time Embodied Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.09294/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used as the reasoning backbone of embodied agents, enabling robots to interpret visual scenes, follow language instructions, and plan multi-step actions. In household environments, however, safety depends not only on recognizing objects, but also on how actions change the physical scene over time. Existing embodied safety evaluations largely focus on static risk recognition, unsafe instruction refusal, or final-state task completion. As a result, process-level safety failures induced by spatial relations such as support, containment, and proximity remain insufficiently studied. To address this gap, we introduce SAFERELBENCH, a spatial-relation-aware safety benchmark with 507 executable evaluation samples, including 248 spatial-relation samples and 259 non-spatial control samples. Using SAFERELBENCH to evaluate seven open- and closed-source VLM-driven embodied agents, we find a substantial gap between task success and process-level safety compliance: models often complete the requested task while violating process-level safety constraints. Unlike prior benchmarks, SAFERELBENCH explicitly tests whether agents satisfy safety conditions before risk-prone actions, making spatial relations a core dimension in embodied safety assessment. More broadly, our results show that safe embodied intelligence requires not only stronger perception and planning, but also reliable reasoning about how object relations shape risk during interaction.