# Implicit Reasoning Steering via Concept Chaining

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14242 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.14242/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 60 of its 81 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/prompting-and-chain-of-thought-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 60)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04730/) (2017)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07229/) (2022)
- [Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13702/) (2023)
- [GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05229/) (2024)
- [Fast Model Editing at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11309/) (2021)
- [Memory-Based Model Editing at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.06520/) (2022)
- [Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17035/) (2023)
- [Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16789/) (2023)
- [Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01558/) (2023)
- [MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14795/) (2023)
- [AlphaEdit: Null-Space Constrained Knowledge Editing for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02355/) (2024)
- [Do Membership Inference Attacks Work on Large Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07841/) (2024)
- [Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16218/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01286/) (2024)
- [GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19255/) (2024)
- [Backdooring Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Virtual Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16888/) (2023)
- [Min-K%++: Improved Baseline for Detecting Pre-Training Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02936/) (2024)
- [WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14768/) (2024)
- [AnyEdit: Edit Any Knowledge Encoded in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05628/) (2025)
- [A Peek into Token Bias: Large Language Models Are Not Yet Genuine Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11050/) (2024)
- [Can Language Models Perform Robust Reasoning in Chain-of-thought Prompting with Noisy Rationales?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.23856/) (2024)
- [Copyright Traps for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09363/) (2024)
- [AKEW: Assessing Knowledge Editing in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18909/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking Reasoning Robustness in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04550/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models often appear to reason reliably, yet on many questions repeated sampling yields both correct and incorrect answers, revealing an underlying fragility in how final decisions are formed. We study whether this fragility can be exploited through implicit reasoning steering: using natural-language text to bias a model toward a designated answer without explicit instructions, triggers, or direct answer cues. Our approach, Concept Chaining, generates a short connection paragraph that links question entities to a target option through one or two intermediate concepts. We then continue pretraining a victim model on these connection paragraphs and evaluate whether its answer preference shifts on the original multiple-choice questions. Our results show that indirect, natural-looking text can systematically steer model predictions while remaining substantially less inferable than direct paraphrases, which shows that reasoning brittleness is not merely an evaluation artifact: it creates a practical channel through which latent biases can be amplified by ordinary-looking text to covertly redirect model decisions.