# IQA-T1: Tool-based Visual Evidence Reasoning for Image Quality Assessment

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12375 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.12375/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 22 of its 63 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined Levels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.17090/) (2023)
- [DeepEyes: Incentivizing "Thinking with Images" via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14362/) (2025)
- [BLIP3-o: A Family of Fully Open Unified Multimodal Models-Architecture, Training and Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09568/) (2025)
- [Pixel Reasoner: Incentivizing Pixel-Space Reasoning with Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15966/) (2025)
- [Imagine while Reasoning in Space: Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07542/) (2025)
- [Thinking with Images for Multimodal Reasoning: Foundations, Methods, and Future Frontiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23918/) (2025)
- [T2I-R1: Reinforcing Image Generation with Collaborative Semantic-level and Token-level CoT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00703/) (2025)
- [Q-Insight: Understanding Image Quality via Visual Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22679/) (2025)
- [ReFocus: Visual Editing as a Chain of Thought for Structured Image Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05452/) (2025)
- [VisualQuality-R1: Reasoning-Induced Image Quality Assessment via Reinforcement Learning to Rank](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14460/) (2025)
- [VRAG-RL: Empower Vision-Perception-Based RAG for Visually Rich Information Understanding via Iterative Reasoning with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22019/) (2025)
- [Visual Agentic Reinforcement Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14246/) (2025)
- [Thinking with Visual Abstract: Enhancing Multimodal Reasoning via Visual Abstraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20164/) (2025)
- [Grounding-IQA: Grounding Multimodal Language Model for Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.17237/) (2024)
- [Dog-IQA: Standard-guided Zero-shot MLLM for Mix-grained Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02505/) (2024)
- [Zoom-IQA: Image Quality Assessment with Reliable Region-Aware Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.02918/) (2026)
- [Investigate the Low-level Visual Perception in Vision-Language based Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.09573/) (2025)
- [Q-Probe: Scaling Image Quality Assessment to High Resolution via Context-Aware Agentic Probing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.15356/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [HeatTok: Enhancing Remote Sensing Image Understanding via Thermodiffusion-based Tokenization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.22485/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Image Quality Assessment (IQA) in open-world environments remains challenging due to limited generalization and interpretability. Recent approaches based on multimodal large language models (MLLMs) introduce textual reasoning for quality prediction, yet their judgments rely heavily on semantically biased internal representations, making them insensitive to low-level perceptual degradations. We propose IQA-T1, a tool-based visual evidence reasoning framework that augments MLLM reasoning with explicit perceptual observations. During inference, the model autonomously invokes specialized analysis tools to generate structured visual evidence, such as noise residual maps, gradient statistics, and frequency spectra, which are progressively integrated into the reasoning process. To support this paradigm, we construct Q-Tool, a dataset containing 11k multimodal reasoning chains grounded in tool-generated evidence. Extensive experiments on seven IQA benchmarks show that IQA-T1 achieves the best overall performance across datasets while producing interpretable and evidence-grounded quality assessments. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/zibuyu-02/IQA-T1.