# Are we Merging the Right Models? Impact of Expert Training Duration on Model Merging for LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11997 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.11997/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phone](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14219/) (2024)
- [HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04249/) (2024)
- [Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05482/) (2022)
- [Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07911/) (2023)
- [Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05407/) (2018)
- [Editing Models with Task Arithmetic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04089/) (2022)
- [Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15124/) (2024)
- [BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04657/) (2023)
- [TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01708/) (2023)
- [Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03099/) (2023)
- [Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02153/) (2025)
- [Magicoder: Empowering Code Generation with OSS-Instruct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02120/) (2023)
- [Aya Dataset: An Open-Access Collection for Multilingual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06619/) (2024)
- [Diverse Weight Averaging for Out-of-Distribution Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09739/) (2022)
- [DART-Math: Difficulty-Aware Rejection Tuning for Mathematical Problem-Solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13690/) (2024)
- [Stop Wasting My Time! Saving Days of ImageNet and BERT Training with Latest Weight Averaging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14981/) (2022)
- [ATM: Improving Model Merging by Alternating Tuning and Merging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.03055/) (2024)
- [Post-Hoc Reversal: Are We Selecting Models Prematurely?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07815/) (2024)
- [(How) Learning Rates Regulate Catastrophic Overtraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13627/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [The evolution of sex for artificial intelligence: a population-genetic framework for multigenerational model populations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.18560/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-task model merging combines separately trained expert models into a single model that handles all tasks without co-training. Standard practice merges experts at their optimal validation loss. We challenge this convention by systematically studying how training duration of domain experts affects the quality of the merged model. We fine-tune experts on five domains (Math, Code, Instruction Following, Multilingual, and Safety) across three model sizes (Qwen 3.5 0.8B, 2B, and 4B), saving checkpoints from 25% to 500% of the optimal training steps and evaluating five merging methods at each duration. Our findings reveal a striking method-dependent pattern: simple averaging degrades sharply with overfitting, while sparsification-based methods achieve their best performance well past the validation optimum. We formalize this through bias-variance decomposition analysis, drawing a parallel to random forests where averaging benefits from high-variance individual learners. These results suggest that training duration and merging method should be chosen jointly rather than independently.