# Time-Lag-Aware Deep Reinforcement Learning for Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling in PPVC Module Factories

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11725 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.11725/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL for energy, networks and operations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 5 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL for energy, networks and operations](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-for-energy-networks-and-operations/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Learning to Dispatch for Job Shop Scheduling via Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12367/) (2020)
- [Flexible Job Shop Scheduling via Dual Attention Network Based Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05119/) (2023)
- [Graph Neural Networks for Job Shop Scheduling Problems: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14096/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction moves most building work into module factories, whose production floor operates as a flexible job shop. A major complication is decisive: long post-operation time-lags caused by concrete curing, watertightness ponding tests, and paint drying, during which a module is blocked while its workstation stays free. On benchmark instances grounded in an official national prefabrication guidebook, these lags inflate even the optimal reference makespan by about 67% on average, and ignoring them at decision time, then repairing to feasibility, is worse than every dispatching rule. We adapt a state-of-the-art dual-attention deep reinforcement learning solver through three minimally invasive, individually ablatable extensions: lag-aware dynamics with an admissible reward bound, two anticipatory lag feature channels, and liveness-masked operation- and station-type embeddings. With every extension disabled the implementation reproduces the original solver exactly, so all gains are attributable to the adaptations. We release a public, guidebook-grounded benchmark generator. On held-out instances the learned policy is the strongest solver-free scheduler: it reaches within about 4% of a constraint-programming reference and beats every dispatching rule and a genetic-algorithm metaheuristic, with its advantage widening under capacity contention, and a single size-mixed policy carries this lead across the trained range of factory sizes. It needs no solver, model, or license in the loop and re-plans within seconds of a disruption; where an exact solver can be deployed, that solver remains the quality ceiling, a boundary we map explicitly.