# LLM Watermarking as Big Data Provenance: A Deployment-Oriented Systematization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10103 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.10103/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 68 of its 92 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Watermarking generated content and models](https://mlsanity.com/safety/watermarking-generated-content-and-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 68)

- [DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04434/) (2024)
- [A Watermark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10226/) (2023)
- [Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defense](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13408/) (2023)
- [Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15593/) (2023)
- [Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17439/) (2023)
- [Undetectable Watermarks for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09194/) (2023)
- [SARATHI: Efficient LLM Inference by Piggybacking Decodes with Chunked Prefills](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.16369/) (2023)
- [On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04634/) (2023)
- [Stealing Part of a Production Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06634/) (2024)
- [Who Wrote this Code? Watermarking for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15060/) (2023)
- [A Semantic Invariant Robust Watermark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06356/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Text Watermarking in the Era of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.07913/) (2023)
- [Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10669/) (2023)
- [MarkLLM: An Open-Source Toolkit for LLM Watermarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.10051/) (2024)
- [Watermark Stealing in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19361/) (2024)
- [Watermarks in the Sand: Impossibility of Strong Watermarking for Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04378/) (2023)
- [Protecting Intellectual Property of Language Generation APIs with Lexical Watermark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.02701/) (2021)
- [On the Learnability of Watermarks for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.04469/) (2023)
- [CATER: Intellectual Property Protection on Text Generation APIs via Conditional Watermarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.08773/) (2022)
- [Watermarking Text Generated by Black-Box Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08883/) (2023)
- [Publicly-Detectable Watermarking for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18491/) (2023)
- [Mark My Words: Analyzing and Evaluating Language Model Watermarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00273/) (2023)
- [Adaptive Text Watermark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13927/) (2024)
- [An Unforgeable Publicly Verifiable Watermark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16230/) (2023)
- [Advancing Beyond Identification: Multi-bit Watermark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00221/) (2023)
- [WaterMax: breaking the LLM watermark detectability-robustness-quality trade-off](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04808/) (2024)
- [k-SemStamp: A Clustering-Based Semantic Watermark for Detection of Machine-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11399/) (2024)
- [No Free Lunch in LLM Watermarking: Trade-offs in Watermarking Design Choices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16187/) (2024)
- [Tracing Text Provenance via Context-Aware Lexical Substitution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.07873/) (2021)
- [Explanation as a Watermark: Towards Harmless and Multi-bit Model Ownership Verification via Watermarking Feature Attribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04825/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Tokenization-Invariant Watermarking: A Byte-Local Method for LLM Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14378/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models (LLMs) become widely deployed, their outputs can be copied, transformed, and redistributed at scale without reliable evidence of origin, creating risks for trust, accountability, intellectual property (IP) protection, and high-stakes decision-making. LLM watermarking addresses this problem by embedding detectable signals into text during or after generation. However, existing methods vary in design assumptions, threat models, and evaluation criteria, while deployment choices such as watermark placement, detection authority, and key management affect reliability, security, and scalability. This paper systematizes LLM watermarking as provenance infrastructure for large-scale data ecosystems. We organize existing approaches along four deployment dimensions: insertion point, verification authority, operational state, and transformation threat model, and relate them to the big data requirements of Volume, Velocity, Variety, Veracity, and Value. We further introduce a Big Data Watermarking Readiness framework centered on four deployment workloads: online generation, streaming detection, transformation pipelines, and ecosystem governance. The framework connects these workloads to system-level requirements including throughput, false-positive control, robustness, cross-domain reliability, governance, and downstream utility. Our analysis highlights a gap between benchmark performance and deployment readiness: false positives accumulate at scale, repeated transformations weaken watermark signals, computational overhead can limit online deployment, and centralized verification can create governance bottlenecks. We conclude with an evaluation blueprint and research directions for scalable, trustworthy provenance in big data ecosystems.