# Exploring Agentic Workflows for Generating High Quality Math Visual Aids

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09839 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.09839/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Educational agents and math problem solving, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 9 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Educational agents and math problem solving](https://mlsanity.com/agents/educational-agents-and-math-problem-solving/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [VQA: Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.00468/) (2015)
- [MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14624/) (2024)
- [Data Interpreter: An LLM Agent For Data Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18679/) (2024)
- [AutomaTikZ: Text-Guided Synthesis of Scientific Vector Graphics with TikZ](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00367/) (2023)
- [DrawEduMath: Evaluating Vision Language Models with Expert-Annotated Students' Hand-Drawn Math Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14877/) (2025)
- [SciDoc2Diagrammer-MAF: Towards Generation of Scientific Diagrams from Documents guided by Multi-Aspect Feedback Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19242/) (2024)
- [An Agentic Approach to Automatic Creation of P&ID Diagrams from Natural Language Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.12898/) (2024)
- [VISTA: Visual Integrated System for Tailored Automation in Math Problem Generation Using LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.05423/) (2024)
- [Polymind: Parallel Visual Diagramming with Large Language Models to Support Prewriting Through Microtasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09577/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Agentic Visual Generation: From Generative Models to Agentic Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.06758/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Mathematical diagrams play a crucial role in K 12 education, both as problem components and as scaffolding for student comprehension. However, current AI tools, including Large Language Models (LLMs), struggle to reliably generate accurate and pedagogically sound visual diagrams, even when provided with detailed descriptions. A significant gap therefore remains in the reliable generation of diagrams for middle school mathematics. To address this, we introduce an agentic workflow that enables LLM agents to evaluate the quality of generated visuals and use this feedback to iteratively improve their outputs. This self improvement loop aims to enhance the accuracy and educational appropriateness of AI generated diagrams. Our research investigates two questions. First, can LLMs accurately generate quality assurance questions for a visual aid given specific criteria for visual quality? Second, given valid quality assurance questions, can Vision Language Models effectively evaluate generated K 12 visual aids and use the resulting feedback to improve them iteratively? We conduct an exploratory evaluation of our agentic workflow and identify key areas for improvement, including stronger spatial reasoning and more comprehensive coverage of diagram features in the generated quality assurance questions. Our results provide preliminary evidence that this approach can improve the reliability and educational value of AI generated mathematical diagrams.