# Learning Predictive Ambiguity Sets for Decision-Focused Distributionally Robust Optimization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09820 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.09820/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [OptNet: Differentiable Optimization as a Layer in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.00443/) (2017)
- [Smart "Predict, then Optimize"](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.08005/) (2017)
- [Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10571/) (2017)
- [Learning Models with Uniform Performance via Distributionally Robust Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.08750/) (2018)
- [Melding the Data-Decisions Pipeline: Decision-Focused Learning for Combinatorial Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.05504/) (2018)
- [Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization: Theory and Applications in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.08729/) (2019)
- [Distributionally Robust Logistic Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.09259/) (2015)
- [Distributionally Robust Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection with Wasserstein Distances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.04885/) (2018)
- [Predict-then-Calibrate: A New Perspective of Robust Contextual LP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15686/) (2023)
- [End-to-end Conditional Robust Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04670/) (2024)
- [Learning Decision-Focused Uncertainty Sets in Robust Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19225/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Predict-then-optimize systems usually compress uncertainty into a point forecast and then solve a downstream optimization problem as if the forecast were reliable. Distributionally robust optimization (DRO) offers protection against misspecification, but the ambiguity set is often centered at historical samples and uses a fixed radius. We propose learned predictive ambiguity sets (LPAS): a deep contextual model outputs a finite nominal scenario distribution, a state-dependent Wasserstein radius, and optionally an anisotropic ground metric. These outputs define a contextual ambiguity set that feeds a DRO decision layer. The radius is trained by a combination of conditional quantile calibration, size regularization, and downstream decision loss, so that robustness is adaptive rather than globally fixed. We derive the finite dual form used by the decision layer, present a staged training algorithm, and evaluate the method on distributionally robust portfolio optimization with 20 S&P 500 constituents from 2018--2026. The proposed method substantially improves over equal-weight, predict-then-optimize, and historical Wasserstein DRO baselines, achieving 26.28% annualized return, Sharpe ratio 1.30, final wealth 1.61, and lower tail loss than a deep fixed-radius DRO baseline while using a smaller average radius. The results show that learned ambiguity radii can recover most of the performance of strong fixed-radius DRO while reducing unnecessary conservatism and improving regime adaptivity.