# Ablation, Statistical Inference, and Validation for KV-Cache Compression

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09683 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.09683/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in KV cache quantization, one of 12 directions in Efficient LLM inference and serving.
- Builds on 5 of its 7 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- Efficient LLM inference and serving / [KV cache quantization](https://mlsanity.com/inference/kv-cache-quantization/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [KIVI: A Tuning-Free Asymmetric 2bit Quantization for KV Cache](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02750/) (2024)
- [KVQuant: Towards 10 Million Context Length LLM Inference with KV Cache Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.18079/) (2024)
- [TurboQuant: Online Vector Quantization with Near-optimal Distortion Rate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.19874/) (2025)
- [QJL: 1-Bit Quantized JL Transform for KV Cache Quantization with Zero Overhead](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.03482/) (2024)
- [Statistical Inference and Quality Measures of KV Cache Quantisations Inspired by TurboQuant](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08114/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study systematically compares Turbo-Quant and SpectralQuant KV-cache compression, evaluating non-dominated schemes, including WHT rotation with Beta Lloyd-Max and QJL, through a statistical validation methodology that separates systematic codec differences from implementation variance. Key findings reveal that while eigenbasis-based methods fail on heavy-tailed data due to covariance instability, they excel in structured regimes, with the effective semantic dimension (deff) adapting to calibration budgets rather than true data rank. (this is an abstract of the abstract thank you )