# Diversifying to Verify: When Task-Equivalent Programs Differ in Verifiability

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09366 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.09366/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.07814/) (2022)
- [LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15626/) (2023)
- [Autoformalization with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12615/) (2022)
- [Baldur: Whole-Proof Generation and Repair with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04910/) (2023)
- [LeetCodeDataset: A Temporal Dataset for Robust Evaluation and Efficient Training of Code LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14655/) (2025)
- [Clover: Closed-Loop Verifiable Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17807/) (2023)
- [Towards AI-Assisted Synthesis of Verified Dafny Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00247/) (2024)
- [Can Large Language Models Transform Natural Language Intent into Formal Method Postconditions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01831/) (2023)
- [DafnyBench: A Benchmark for Formal Software Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08467/) (2024)
- [Verus: Verifying Rust Programs using Linear Ghost Types (extended version)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05491/) (2023)
- [SpecGen: Automated Generation of Formal Program Specifications via Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08807/) (2024)
- [Lemur: Integrating Large Language Models in Automated Program Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04870/) (2023)
- [AutoVerus: Automated Proof Generation for Rust Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13082/) (2024)
- [Finding Inductive Loop Invariants using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07948/) (2023)
- [Ranking LLM-Generated Loop Invariants for Program Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09342/) (2023)
- [Towards Neural Synthesis for SMT-Assisted Proof-Oriented Programming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01787/) (2024)
- [dafny-annotator: AI-Assisted Verification of Dafny Programs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15143/) (2024)
- [Inferring multiple helper Dafny assertions with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.00125/) (2025)
- [Can Large Language Models Autoformalize Kinematics?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21840/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Program verification is crucial for software correctness, but producing fully verified programs remains difficult in practice. This paper studies whether implementation structure affects automated verifiability when multiple generated programs are intended to satisfy the same task-level semantics. We present Diversify2Verify, a staged LLM-based pipeline for Why3 that infers representation-specific contracts, generates and tests diverse recursive and imperative array/list implementations, and attempts verification with bounded verifier-guided annotation repair. We also construct a verification-oriented benchmark of 73 tasks over integers, arrays, and lists, yielding 292 implementation variants. Diversify2Verify verifies 96 artifacts initially and 154 after two repair passes, improving artifact-level verification from 32.9% to 52.7%. At the task level, at least one variant verifies for 49 of 73 tasks, a 67.1% success rate. These results show that task-equivalent implementations can differ substantially in verifiability and that implementation diversity helps find verification-friendly artifacts.