# PRecG: Legal Precedent Retrieval with Graph Neural Networks and Rhetorical Role Segmentation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09094 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.09094/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Graph Attention Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10903/) (2017)
- [Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.17617/) (2023)
- [SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11370/) (2023)
- [An Empirical Evaluation of doc2vec with Practical Insights into Document Embedding Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.05368/) (2016)
- [Identification of Rhetorical Roles of Sentences in Indian Legal Judgments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05405/) (2019)
- [Pre-trained Language Models for the Legal Domain: A Case Study on Indian Law](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06049/) (2022)
- [PromptReps: Prompting Large Language Models to Generate Dense and Sparse Representations for Zero-Shot Document Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18424/) (2024)
- [Named Entity Recognition in Indian court judgments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.03442/) (2022)
- [Legal Case Document Similarity: You Need Both Network and Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.12474/) (2022)
- [DELTA: Pre-train a Discriminative Encoder for Legal Case Retrieval via Structural Word Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.18435/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Legal precedent retrieval is a fundamental task in legal case preparation, planning, litigation strategy, and legal research. Current approaches for automatic precedent retrieval map legal documents to a low-dimensional semantic space and compute similarity based on the proximity of their representations. These approaches treat legal documents as monolithic texts, ignoring the rhetorical organization of the legal technicalities. Ergo, they overlook nuanced legal meanings and fail to distinguish the contextual significance of legal entities and concepts that vary based on their rhetorical roles within the document. To address this insufficiency, we propose the PRecG pipeline that computes the similarity between pairs of legal judgments by hierarchically learning their representations. The process begins by decomposing each document into distinct semantic units (segments) based on the rhetorical roles of sentences. For each rhetorical segment, a knowledge graph is constructed to capture the legal entities and their relationships within the segment. Contextual representations of the entities are then learned and aggregated to derive segment-level embeddings. These embeddings are further integrated to produce a unified document-level representation, and finally, the semantic similarity between a pair of documents is computed. We validate the performance of the proposed approach through extensive experiments on a benchmark Indian legal dataset, comparing it against state-of-the-art baselines to demonstrate its effectiveness.