# Closing the Null Space: Guidance-Aware Quantization for Classifier-Free Diffusion

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08241 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.08241/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 15 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Diffusion foundations and sampling](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/diffusion-foundations-and-sampling/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02502/) (2020)
- [Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05233/) (2021)
- [Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12598/) (2022)
- [Improved Techniques for Training GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03498/) (2016)
- [Up or Down? Adaptive Rounding for Post-Training Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10568/) (2020)
- [BRECQ: Pushing the Limit of Post-Training Quantization by Block Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05426/) (2021)
- [HAWQ: Hessian AWare Quantization of Neural Networks with Mixed-Precision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.03696/) (2019)
- [Q-Diffusion: Quantizing Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04304/) (2023)
- [Post-training Quantization on Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15736/) (2022)
- [PTQD: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10657/) (2023)
- [TFMQ-DM: Temporal Feature Maintenance Quantization for Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16503/) (2023)
- [Towards Accurate Post-training Quantization for Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18723/) (2023)
- [TCAQ-DM: Timestep-Channel Adaptive Quantization for Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16700/) (2024)
- [DASH: Dual-Branch Score Distillation for Guidance-Calibrated Compact Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.00798/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Joint Branch-Space Transform Coding for Diffusion Activation Quantization with Classifier-Free Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00930/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deploying classifier-free guidance (CFG) diffusion models under real-world compute budgets requires quantization, yet existing post-training quantization (PTQ) methods treat CFG models as single-branch networks, ignoring the paired conditional/unconditional structure that CFG inference fundamentally relies on. This structural blind spot has two consequences. At the system level, the two-pass CFG execution pattern imposes a latency overhead that parameter-count and bit-operation metrics conceal entirely, and commodity INT8 inference stacks fail to realize the theoretical efficiency gains that BOPs calculations promise. At the algorithmic level, calibrating against the guidance gap alone admits an exact null space: a quantized model can achieve perfect gap-fidelity diagnostics while the unconditional branch drifts arbitrarily, corrupting every guided prediction at inference time. This paper terms this the branch-drift trap, proves its existence analytically, and confirms it empirically through a false-positive result in which the best-calibrated model by standard diagnostics simultaneously produces the worst sample quality. To close the trap, Guidance-Aware Mixed Precision (GAMP) is proposed, which calibrates directly on the guided prediction, derives per-layer activation-bit sensitivity from guided-output degradation, and allocates bits via a greedy knapsack -- provably preventing unconditional branch drift by construction.