# From Execution to Education: A Bloom-Aligned Framework for Measuring Educational Control in LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08009 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.08009/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.03426/) (2018)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.01644/) (2016)
- [Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01405/) (2023)
- [Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00593/) (2022)
- [Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12452/) (2021)
- [BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05794/) (2022)
- [The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03658/) (2023)
- [BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15877/) (2024)
- [Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19647/) (2024)
- [Language Models Represent Space and Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02207/) (2023)
- [Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02013/) (2025)
- [Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00719/) (2020)
- [The Widening Gap: The Benefits and Harms of Generative AI for Novice Programmers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17739/) (2024)
- [The Effects of Generative AI on Computing Students' Help-Seeking Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.02262/) (2024)
- [Exploring the Design Space of Cognitive Engagement Techniques with AI-Generated Code for Enhanced Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08922/) (2024)
- [How Do LLMs Use Their Depth?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.18871/) (2025)
- [BloomAPR: A Bloom's Taxonomy-based Framework for Assessing the Capabilities of LLM-Powered APR Solutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25465/) (2025)
- [Neuron-Guided Interpretation of Code LLMs: Where, Why, and How?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.19980/) (2025)
- [BloomWise: Enhancing Problem-Solving capabilities of Large Language Models using Bloom's-Taxonomy-Inspired Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04094/) (2024)
- [From Recall to Reasoning: Automated Question Generation for Deeper Math Learning through Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11899/) (2025)
- [Mechanistic Interpretability of Cognitive Complexity in LLMs via Linear Probing using Bloom's Taxonomy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.17229/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a Bloom-aligned framework for measuring educational control in Large Language Models (LLMs): the ability to preserve a task's instructional intent while shifting its cognitive demand toward specified learning objectives. We apply this framework to programming tasks in computer science education to study the gap between solving tasks and adapting them for learners. Using revised Bloom's Taxonomy as an operational scale of cognitive demand, we evaluate two intervention settings: general difficulty control, where models are asked to make tasks harder or easier, and Bloom's control, where models are asked to target higher or lower Bloom's levels. We evaluate a matched Qwen3-Next model pair, comparing Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct with Qwen3-Coder-Next across 2,520 tasks from three benchmarks. The framework reveals a robust directional asymmetry: both models reliably increase cognitive demand, but struggle to lower it. We further characterize these outcomes with semantic-delta clustering and layer-wise Fisher's Discriminant Ratio probing. Within this controlled comparison, the general model shows clearer middle-layer separability for both general difficulty and Bloom-control contrasts, whereas the coder model shows weaker separability for general difficulty and a deeper peak for Bloom-control contrasts. These results show that strong execution performance does not automatically entail Bloom-aligned educational control.