# Principled Analysis of Deep Reinforcement Learning Evaluation and Design Paradigms

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07769 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07769/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 9 of its 15 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [Deep RL algorithms and representations](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/deep-rl-algorithms-and-representations/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.06461/) (2015)
- [Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08265/) (2019)
- [Prioritized Experience Replay](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.05952/) (2015)
- [Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06581/) (2015)
- [RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00267/) (2023)
- [Image Augmentation Is All You Need: Regularizing Deep Reinforcement Learning from Pixels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.13649/) (2020)
- [Mastering Atari Games with Limited Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.00210/) (2021)
- [Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman Error](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00153/) (2020)
- [Muesli: Combining Improvements in Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06159/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Starting from the utilization of deep neural networks to approximate the state-action value function that led to winning one of the most challenging games, to algorithmic advancements that allowed solving problems without even explicitly stating the rules of the challenge at hand, reinforcement learning research has been the center of remarkable scientific progress for the past decade. In this paper, we focus on the key ingredients of this research progress and we analyze the canonical evaluation and design paradigms in reinforcement learning. We introduce the theoretical foundations of scaling laws in reinforcement learning and show that the asymptotic performance of reinforcement learning algorithms does not have a monotone relationship between performance rankings and data-regimes. We conduct large-scale experiments and our results demonstrate that a line of reinforcement learning research under the canonical design and evaluation paradigms resulted in incorrect conclusions. Our analysis and results provide a core analysis on scaling, capacity and complexity of deep reinforcement learning.