# Guidance Breaks the Fitted Operator: A Terminal-Fitted Repair for Classifier-Free Guidance

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07665 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07665/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 10 of its 11 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Diffusion foundations and sampling](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/diffusion-foundations-and-sampling/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02502/) (2020)
- [Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12598/) (2022)
- [Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00364/) (2022)
- [Applying Guidance in a Limited Interval Improves Sample and Distribution Quality in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07724/) (2024)
- [CFG++: Manifold-constrained Classifier Free Guidance for Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08070/) (2024)
- [Eliminating Oversaturation and Artifacts of High Guidance Scales in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02416/) (2024)
- [Classifier-Free Guidance is a Predictor-Corrector](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.09000/) (2024)
- [CFG-Zero*: Improved Classifier-Free Guidance for Flow Matching Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18886/) (2025)
- [What does guidance do? A fine-grained analysis in a simple setting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13074/) (2024)
- [C2FG: Control Classifier-Free Guidance via Score Discrepancy Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08155/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Classifier-free guidance (CFG) is the standard way to strengthen class-conditioning in diffusion and flow-matching samplers, yet at large guidance it oversaturates and destabilizes, symptoms practitioners suppress with more steps or limited-interval schedules. We analyze CFG through an asymptotic-preserving, numerical-analysis lens. Building on a recent result that the deterministic DDIM step is the unique fitted operator for the unguided terminal layer, exact on the final small-sigma stretch of sampling, we show that guidance re-stiffens exactly the discriminative subspace to an anomalous exponent 1+w. DDIM is therefore no longer fitted there, and on coarse meshes its guided residual diverges as sigma_min goes to zero. We prove a guided clock barrier with three ordered step-size thresholds, and read one-step oversaturation as its endpoint: a solver artifact on the calibration model rather than the continuous guided law. The same analysis yields a one-coefficient, zero-extra-NFE repair: replace CFG's w(r-1) by r^(1+w)-r on the guidance direction. On the calibration model's discriminative crossover, this removes CFG's sigma_min-divergent blow-up and is first-order accurate against the exact guided flow as sigma_min goes to zero. On learned CIFAR-10 checkpoints, and as a cross-domain smoke test on Stable Diffusion 1.5 DDIM, it acts as a high-guidance stabilizer at no extra cost rather than a universal quality knob: it cuts residual amplification and saturation, gives 9/9 point-FID wins over CFG on the tested grid, and preserves classifier-proxy target accuracy in the hard-cell blocks. We report the limits alongside: it is not a universal image-quality win, and against a dense vanilla-CFG reference it is not a uniformly better integrator of that field.