# Where to Intervene? Benchmarking Fairness-Aware Learning on Differentially Private Synthetic Tabular Data

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07471 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07471/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 58 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- [Deep Learning with Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.00133/) (2016)
- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [Certifying and removing disparate impact](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.3756/) (2014)
- [A Reductions Approach to Fair Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02453/) (2018)
- [Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.04884/) (2021)
- [On Fairness and Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.02012/) (2017)
- [AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.01943/) (2018)
- [Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12101/) (2019)
- [Scalable Private Learning with PATE](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08908/) (2018)
- [DP-CGAN: Differentially Private Synthetic Data and Label Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.09700/) (2020)
- [Synthetic Data -- Anonymisation Groundhog Day](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.07018/) (2020)
- [Winning the NIST Contest: A scalable and general approach to differentially private synthetic data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.04978/) (2021)
- [On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.03731/) (2020)
- [Neither Private Nor Fair: Impact of Data Imbalance on Utility and Fairness in Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.06389/) (2020)
- [Differential Privacy and Fairness in Decisions and Learning Tasks: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.08187/) (2022)
- [A Unified Framework for Quantifying Privacy Risk in Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10459/) (2022)
- [DP-SGD vs PATE: Which Has Less Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12576/) (2021)
- [The Inadequacy of Similarity-based Privacy Metrics: Privacy Attacks against "Truly Anonymous" Synthetic Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.05114/) (2023)
- [Graphical vs. Deep Generative Models: Measuring the Impact of Differentially Private Mechanisms and Budgets on Utility](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10994/) (2023)
- [The DCR Delusion: Measuring the Privacy Risk of Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.01524/) (2025)
- [Evaluating the Fairness Impact of Differentially Private Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.04321/) (2022)
- [On the Alignment of Group Fairness with Attribute Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10209/) (2022)
- [Synthetic Tabular Data: Methods, Attacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06108/) (2025)
- [Assessment of Differentially Private Synthetic Data for Utility and Fairness in End-to-End Machine Learning Pipelines for Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19250/) (2023)
- [A Systematic and Formal Study of the Impact of Local Differential Privacy on Fairness: Preliminary Results](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14725/) (2024)
- [PFGuard: A Generative Framework with Privacy and Fairness Safeguards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02246/) (2024)
- [SoK: What Makes Private Learning Unfair?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14414/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Portable Causal Fairness Across Synthetic Data Generator Families](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.03180/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, raising concerns about both privacy and fairness. Differential Privacy (DP) has become a gold standard for privacy-preserving data analysis, while fairness-aware mechanisms aim to mitigate discrimination against underrepresented groups. However, these objectives can conflict: DP often amplifies disparities across demographic groups, and little is known about whether established fairness interventions remain effective under DP constraints. In this work, we present, to our knowledge, the first systematic evaluation of fairness interventions on differentially private synthetic tabular data. Our benchmark centers on the Adaptive Iterative Mechanism (AIM), identified as the state-of-the-art marginal-based DP synthesizer (Cormode et al. 2025). We thus evaluate fairness interventions across four datasets, multiple group fairness metrics, and three categories of mitigation strategies (pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing) under a wide range of privacy budgets. We compare four pipeline configurations: (Baseline) training on original data; (DP-only) training on DP synthetic data; (Fair-only) applying fairness mechanisms on original data; and (DP+Fair) combining fairness mechanisms with DP synthetic data. Our results demonstrate that while DP alone can degrade both utility and fairness, applying fairness interventions can partially restore equitable outcomes. Among them, post-processing methods tend to provide more stable fairness-utility trade-offs across privacy budgets and synthesizers, achieving strong fairness improvements while preserving competitive utility relative to other intervention stages. We release all code, data, and experimental artifacts in an open-source repository to ensure full reproducibility and to support future research on the privacy-fairness-utility trade-off.