# Beware of Agentic Botnets: Scalable Untargeted Promptware Attacks via Universal and Transferable Adversarial HalluSquatting

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07433 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07433/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 8 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)
- LLM safety and security / [Prompt injection and agent security](https://mlsanity.com/safety/prompt-injection-and-agent-security/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12173/) (2023)
- [We Have a Package for You! A Comprehensive Analysis of Package Hallucinations by Code Generating LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10279/) (2024)
- [LLM-based Agents Suffer from Hallucinations: A Survey of Taxonomy, Methods, and Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18970/) (2025)
- [Importing Phantoms: Measuring LLM Package Hallucination Vulnerabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19012/) (2025)
- [Invitation Is All You Need! Promptware Attacks Against LLM-Powered Assistants in Production Are Practical and Dangerous](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.12175/) (2025)
- [Cloak and Detonate: Scanner Evasion and Dynamic Detection of Agent Skill Malware](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.02357/) (2026)
- [Trust No AI: Prompt Injection Along The CIA Security Triad](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06090/) (2024)
- [Investigating Security Implications of Automatically Generated Code on the Software Supply Chain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.20277/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The growing adoption of agentic LLM applications has introduced a new threat previously named as promptware. While prior work has established that adversaries can exploit direct channels to LLM applications to apply promptware under weak threat models, many applications do not provide any direct channels that could be exploited for prompt injection beyond the Internet. This raises a question: can attackers exploit LLM applications at scale without any direct channels in practical threat models? In this work, we show that the inherent tendency of LLMs to hallucinate resource identifiers can be exploited to amplify untargeted promptware attacks that pull adversarial prompts at scale and could be exploited to establish a botnet. We introduce adversarial hallucination squatting, a technique in which attackers identify trending resources (e.g., popular repositories, popular skills, etc.), compute the LLM distribution of hallucinations on the trending resource names, and preemptively register them to host adversarial prompts. By leveraging the predictability and transferability of hallucinations across foundational LLMs and to application layers, adversaries can significantly amplify the reach of untargeted promptware under weak threat models and establish a botnet by exploiting LLM applications to install a bot on the device that pulled the compromised hallucinated resource from the Inter. We empirically demonstrate that hallucinated resource generation occurs at high rates, up to 85% in repository cloning scenarios and up to 100% in skill installation, and that these hallucinations transfer between foundational models and different prompts. We demonstrate the practicality of adversarial hallucination squatting against various production LLM applications with integrated terminals in their set of tools, achieving remote tool execution and remote code execution.