# Stage-Aware Adaptation and Distribution Calibration for Subject-Driven Personalized Text-to-Image Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07173 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07173/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Image generation, text-to-image and editing, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 19 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Image generation, text-to-image and editing](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/image-generation-text-to-image-and-editing/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01952/) (2023)
- [DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.12242/) (2022)
- [An Image is Worth One Word: Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.01618/) (2022)
- [Multi-Concept Customization of Text-to-Image Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04488/) (2022)
- [InstantBooth: Personalized Text-to-Image Generation without Test-Time Finetuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03411/) (2023)
- [SVDiff: Compact Parameter Space for Diffusion Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11305/) (2023)
- [MS-Diffusion: Multi-subject Zero-shot Image Personalization with Layout Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07209/) (2024)
- [DisenBooth: Identity-Preserving Disentangled Tuning for Subject-Driven Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03374/) (2023)
- [DreamMatcher: Appearance Matching Self-Attention for Semantically-Consistent Text-to-Image Personalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09812/) (2024)
- [CustomContrast: A Multilevel Contrastive Perspective For Subject-Driven Text-to-Image Customization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.05606/) (2024)
- [DisEnvisioner: Disentangled and Enriched Visual Prompt for Customized Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02067/) (2024)
- [AttnDreamBooth: Towards Text-Aligned Personalized Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05000/) (2024)
- [PaRa: Personalizing Text-to-Image Diffusion via Parameter Rank Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05641/) (2024)
- [Hollowed Net for On-Device Personalization of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.01179/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Subject-driven personalized text-to-image generation requires a pretrained diffusion model to acquire a specific subject from a few reference images while preserving subject identity, following novel text prompts, and maintaining sample diversity. Existing optimization-based methods instantiate subject adaptation through full fine-tuning, textual embedding optimization, or low-rank parameter updates; PaRa further constrains personalization from the perspective of parameter rank reduction. However, a uniform low-rank constraint or a uniform adapter strength cannot explicitly distinguish the capacity requirements of different denoising stages. Moreover, inference-time candidate selection driven mainly by identity similarity may compress the selected samples in the visual representation space. We decompose the problem into two complementary components: SPaRa denotes training-side stage-aware low-rank adaptation, DCAL denotes inference-side distribution-calibrated candidate selection, and SPaRa-DCAL denotes the combined framework. Theoretical analysis shows that timestep-dependent scaling controls the effective perturbation magnitude of a low-rank adapter, while identity-biased candidate selection restricts the radius of selected features around the reference center under explicit conditions. Auditable experiments under the SDXL and DreamBooth 30-subject protocol show that DCAL improves 1-LPIPS, CLIP-I, DINO-I, and CLIP-T on a fixed LoRA candidate pool, while revealing a clear trade-off with CLIP/DINO pairwise diversity and pairwise LPIPS. These results indicate that personalized generation should be evaluated through identity consistency, text alignment, and representation diversity rather than identity metrics alone.