# Making Implicit Preservation Intent Explicit in Conversational Image Editing

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.07051 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07051/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 18 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [InstructPix2Pix: Learning to Follow Image Editing Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09800/) (2022)
- [MasaCtrl: Tuning-Free Mutual Self-Attention Control for Consistent Image Synthesis and Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08465/) (2023)
- [MagicBrush: A Manually Annotated Dataset for Instruction-Guided Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10012/) (2023)
- [HQ-Edit: A High-Quality Dataset for Instruction-based Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09990/) (2024)
- [SEED-Data-Edit Technical Report: A Hybrid Dataset for Instructional Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04007/) (2024)
- [Agent Banana: High-Fidelity Image Editing with Agentic Thinking and Tooling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.09084/) (2026)
- [CHATEDIT: Towards Multi-turn Interactive Facial Image Editing via Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11108/) (2023)
- [Balancing Preservation and Modification: A Region and Semantic Aware Metric for Instruction-Based Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13827/) (2025)
- [An LLM-LVLM Driven Agent for Iterative and Fine-Grained Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.17435/) (2025)
- [Improving Editability in Image Generation with Layer-wise Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.01079/) (2025)
- [IMAGAgent: Orchestrating Multi-Turn Image Editing via Constraint-Aware Planning and Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.29602/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Conversational image editing requires preserving not only visible content, but also content that temporarily disappears across turns. When newly added or modified content occludes a previously visible region, that region should reappear if it was never semantically changed. However, existing systems often fail to recover such occluded-but-unchanged content, producing inconsistent or hallucinated results. We introduce OCCUR-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark for temporal preservation in conversational image editing. OCCUR-Bench provides diverse occlusion-and-revelation scenarios with historical restoration references, enabling evaluation of faithful restoration rather than plausible regeneration. We also propose ReSpec, a training-free framework that makes implicit preservation explicit by pairing restoration-aware instructions with historical visual references. Given an editing history, ReSpec identifies what should persist, selects the historical image state that provides missing visual evidence, and conditions an in-context editor on the resulting instruction and reference image. Experiments show that ReSpec improves restoration fidelity and temporal consistency on OCCUR-Bench, highlighting the need to ground preservation in editing history rather than only the current image.