# Quadrature-Aware Complex-Linear Neural Operator for Boundary-to-Field Prediction in Resonant Acoustics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.04407 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.04407/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00593/) (2016)
- [Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08895/) (2020)
- [Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.10739/) (2020)
- [DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03193/) (2019)
- [Deep Sets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06114/) (2017)
- [Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03409/) (2020)
- [Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01050/) (2021)
- [Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11075/) (2019)
- [Geometry-Informed Neural Operator for Large-Scale 3D PDEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00583/) (2023)
- [Deep Complex Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.09792/) (2017)
- [Learning Neural Acoustic Fields](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.00628/) (2022)
- [Learning Only On Boundaries: a Physics-Informed Neural operator for Solving Parametric Partial Differential Equations in Complex Geometries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12939/) (2023)
- [Sound propagation in realistic interactive 3D scenes with parameterized sources using deep neural operators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.05141/) (2023)
- [Kernel Neural Operators (KNOs) for Scalable, Memory-efficient, Geometrically-flexible Operator Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.00809/) (2024)
- [Room impulse response reconstruction with physics-informed deep learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01206/) (2024)
- [Physics-informed neural networks for one-dimensional sound field predictions with parameterized sources and impedance boundaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.11313/) (2021)
- [SVD-NO: Learning PDE Solution Operators with SVD Integral Kernels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.10025/) (2025)
- [Sound Field Reconstruction Using a Compact Acoustics-informed Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08904/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Repeated prediction of acoustic fields from spatially distributed boundary excitation is computationally expensive when each source realization requires a new wave simulation. This work introduces a quadrature-aware complex-linear boundary operator (CLBO) that maps complex normal velocity on a vibrating surface to complex pressure at receiver locations. The model couples learned source and receiver basis functions through an explicit complex surface-quadrature contraction, so the boundary excitation enters linearly by construction. This preserves complex superposition, homogeneity, and zero response to zero excitation, while representing the source through coordinates, normals, and quadrature weights rather than a fixed flattened input vector. Reference data were generated using a verified three-dimensional multiple-relaxation-time (MRT) lattice Boltzmann solver and stored in a solver-agnostic boundary-to-field format. CLBO was compared with a fixed-sensor complex DeepONet under matched case splits and optimization settings, with additional tests of structural consistency, receiver-coordinate interpolation, source discretization, source-family holdout, label efficiency, physics-informed ablations, unseen source mixtures, and computational cost. Across five training seeds, CLBO achieved a mean complex relative field error of 0.184 +/- 0.00771, compared with 0.367 +/- 0.00742 for DeepONet. Its measured source-superposition error was 1.31 x 10^-7, and its mean error on newly simulated mixed-source cases was 0.237, compared with 0.415 for DeepONet. Inference was 1.83 x 10^4 faster than the reference calculation for the reported query size. These results show that enforcing the known complex-linear boundary-to-field structure improves physical consistency and generalization under distributed acoustic excitation.