# A Decomposable Probe for Few-Step Diffusion Models: Prompt, Latent, and Score Selectivity across Backbone Families and Distillation Paradigms

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03256 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.03256/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 35 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Diffusion foundations and sampling](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/diffusion-foundations-and-sampling/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02502/) (2020)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09748/) (2022)
- [Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12598/) (2022)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.00567/) (2015)
- [SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01952/) (2023)
- [Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03206/) (2024)
- [Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03003/) (2022)
- [Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1306.0895/) (2013)
- [Consistency Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.01469/) (2023)
- [One-step Diffusion with Distribution Matching Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.18828/) (2023)
- [PixArt-α: Fast Training of Diffusion Transformer for Photorealistic Text-to-Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00426/) (2023)
- [Latent Consistency Models: Synthesizing High-Resolution Images with Few-Step Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04378/) (2023)
- [Adversarial Diffusion Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17042/) (2023)
- [Improved Distribution Matching Distillation for Fast Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14867/) (2024)
- [Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14189/) (2023)
- [The Vendi Score: A Diversity Evaluation Metric for Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02410/) (2022)
- [Guiding a Diffusion Model with a Bad Version of Itself](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02507/) (2024)
- [SDXL-Lightning: Progressive Adversarial Diffusion Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13929/) (2024)
- [LCM-LoRA: A Universal Stable-Diffusion Acceleration Module](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05556/) (2023)
- [FreeU: Free Lunch in Diffusion U-Net](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11497/) (2023)
- [Effectively Unbiased FID and Inception Score and where to find them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.07023/) (2019)
- [Hyper-SD: Trajectory Segmented Consistency Model for Efficient Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13686/) (2024)
- [PIXART-δ: Fast and Controllable Image Generation with Latent Consistency Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05252/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Few-step distilled diffusion students cut text-to-image inference from ~50 to 1-8 network evaluations, but the quality gap is usually summarised by a single FID/CLIP scalar that cannot say which axis of the conditioning response changed, nor whether a behaviour comes from the architecture, the distillation objective, or simply from being a diffusion model. We replace the scalar with a decomposable probe that injects controlled perturbations along three layers (prompt encoder, denoiser input, denoiser output) under three modes (mean, variance, scale) and six strengths, reporting a bootstrap-median Bures W2^2 selectivity ratio on Inception features. Under a single matched estimator across 23 models -- five teachers and 18 distilled students spanning five backbone families (SDXL, SD1.5, SD3.5, PixArt-alpha, FLUX), three architecture classes (UNet, DiT, MMDiT), and five distillation paradigms -- the three layers read three empirically separable factors: the prompt layer is a universal prompt-mean response (a sanity channel, not a discriminator), the latent layer reads the prediction type, and the score layer reads the distillation objective. Our main result: within this sweep, the latent layer is a near-binary detector of rectified-flow backbones. Its ratio exceeds 1 across a sustained low-to-mid band only for rectified-flow models (SD3.5, FLUX); no epsilon-prediction model qualifies. A matched epsilon-prediction control (PixArt-alpha) rules out wide-T5 conditioning, and the fingerprint survives adversarial (ADD) distillation as both teacher and student. Two secondary score-layer findings hold under narrower scopes: a canonical 4-step ADD-vs-rest contrast on the UNet families with a non-ADD baseline, and a CI-separated trajectory-rollout early-strength score spike on both UNet and DiT. All ratios are CI-citable under one estimator; we release the per-cell tables and the estimator.