# Learning to Suppress SPAD-based LiDAR Flare

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03247 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.03247/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00593/) (2016)
- [Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.4038/) (2014)
- [PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02413/) (2017)
- [Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.02611/) (2018)
- [SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.15203/) (2021)
- [Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.01527/) (2021)
- [V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.04797/) (2016)
- [4D Spatio-Temporal ConvNets: Minkowski Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08755/) (2019)
- [Point Transformer V3: Simpler, Faster, Stronger](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10035/) (2023)
- [RandLA-Net: Efficient Semantic Segmentation of Large-Scale Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11236/) (2019)
- [Segmentation Transformer: Object-Contextual Representations for Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11065/) (2019)
- [Point-Voxel CNN for Efficient 3D Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.03739/) (2019)
- [SalsaNext: Fast, Uncertainty-aware Semantic Segmentation of LiDAR Point Clouds for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.03653/) (2020)
- [K-Net: Towards Unified Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.14855/) (2021)
- [Rethinking Range View Representation for LiDAR Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05367/) (2023)
- [Cylinder3D: An Effective 3D Framework for Driving-scene LiDAR Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.01550/) (2020)
- [Lidar for Autonomous Driving: The principles, challenges, and trends for automotive lidar and perception systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.08467/) (2020)
- [Asynchronous Single-Photon 3D Imaging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.06372/) (2019)
- [Photon-Flooded Single-Photon 3D Cameras](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.08347/) (2019)
- [Adaptive Gating for Single-Photon 3D Imaging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.15047/) (2021)
- [Ghost-FWL: A Large-Scale Full-Waveform LiDAR Dataset for Ghost Detection and Removal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.28224/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Single-Photon Avalanche Diode (SPAD)-based Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is emerging for autonomous vehicles due to its high sensitivity and precise depth sensing capabilities. However, flare caused by excessive photon returns or pile-up effects can lead to incorrect depth estimation and exaggerated boundaries in point clouds, resulting in severe distortions of geometric measurements, making flare suppression essential for safety-critical applications. Existing flare mitigation methods primarily operate at the hardware or signal-processing levels. While effective under specific configurations, they are largely rule-based and configuration-dependent, lacking learnable representations that generalize across diverse sensing scenarios. In this work, we reformulate flare suppression as a semantic segmentation problem, enabling data-driven learning of geometric and photometric cues directly from SPAD measurements. We first benchmark representative segmentation models on the newly introduced SPAD flare dataset and observe that they struggle to exploit the intrinsic multi-echo characteristics of SPAD signals. Motivated by this observation, we propose Physically-Informed segmentation for LiDAR Flare (PILF), a learning-based approach that treats the first and second echoes, together with ambient illumination, as distinct modalities, aggregating cross-echo information while jointly encoding geometric and photometric features. Experiments across multiple real-world scenes demonstrate that PILF significantly outperforms compared segmentation models, achieving up to 79.32% mIoU, and providing an effective solution for SPAD-based LiDAR flare suppression.