# CLAP: Closed-Loop Training, Evaluation, and Release Control for Domain Agent Post-training

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01846 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.01846/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03629/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03688/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06435/) (2023)
- [RAFT: Adapting Language Model to Domain Specific RAG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10131/) (2024)
- [RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08555/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Retrieval-Augmented Text Generation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.10981/) (2024)
- [Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning in Large Models: A Survey of Methodologies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19878/) (2024)
- [LaMDAgent: An Autonomous Framework for Post-Training Pipeline Optimization via LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21963/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Domain agents often face noisy business data, uncertain post-training gains, offline/application mismatch, and adapter-release risk. This paper presents CLAP (Closed-Loop Agent Post-training), a closed-loop method that converts business data into structured SFT samples, decision-preference samples, holdout sets, risk diagnostics, and release-gate records. CLAP combines data validation, target/evidence normalization, reward/KL diagnosis, offline gates, and application-chain replay to decide whether an adapter is suitable for the target application chain. On five anonymized manufacturing-scenario batches, QLoRA-style LoRA-SFT yields modest average gains: overall score increases by 0.0098, pass rate by 0.0240, and evidence accuracy by 0.0280, while hallucination and wrong facts decrease. Yet only 3 of 5 batches improve, some batches regress, and GRPO exposes high KL risks. Application-chain replay further shows that RAG is necessary for factual extraction; under the same 3B backbone and 100 replay cases, an application-RAG-oriented LoRA-SFT adapter improves value, core fields, and answer-evidence doc/page matching over base+RAG, but increases latency. These results support managing domain-agent post-training through an integrated data-training-evaluation-release loop rather than relying on training completion or a single offline score.