# From Forgeries to Foundation Models: A Systematic Survey of Identity Document Attack and Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01442 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.01442/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 93 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.07004/) (2016)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04977/) (2019)
- [Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.08155/) (2016)
- [Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.08608/) (2017)
- [Training Generative Adversarial Networks with Limited Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.06676/) (2020)
- [FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08971/) (2019)
- [MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06627/) (2021)
- [IML-ViT: Benchmarking Image Manipulation Localization by Vision Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14863/) (2023)
- [MIDV-500: A Dataset for Identity Documents Analysis and Recognition on Mobile Devices in Video Stream](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.05786/) (2018)
- [MIDV-2020: A Comprehensive Benchmark Dataset for Identity Document Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.00396/) (2021)
- [MIDV-2019: Challenges of the modern mobile-based document OCR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.04009/) (2019)
- [First Competition on Presentation Attack Detection on ID Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.00372/) (2024)
- [Deep Learning-based Forgery Attack on Document Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.00653/) (2021)
- [Second Competition on Presentation Attack Detection on ID Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.20404/) (2025)
- [Two-branch Multi-scale Deep Neural Network for Generalized Document Recapture Attack Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.16786/) (2022)
- [Few-Shot Learning: Expanding ID Cards Presentation Attack Detection to Unknown ID Countries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.06842/) (2024)
- [IDTrust: Deep Identity Document Quality Detection with Bandpass Filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00573/) (2024)
- [FakeIDet: Exploring Patches for Privacy-Preserving Fake ID Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07761/) (2025)
- [Multi-modal Document Presentation Attack Detection With Forensics Trace Disentanglement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06663/) (2024)
- [Identity Document and banknote security forensics: a survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.08993/) (2019)
- [EdgeDoc: Hybrid CNN-Transformer Model for Accurate Forgery Detection and Localization in ID Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.16284/) (2025)
- [Detecting Text Manipulation in Images using Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.10278/) (2025)
- [Layout-Aware Representation Learning for Open-Set ID Fraud Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.05215/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [FRAGMENT: Factorized Graph Representations for Document Generation and Editing via Entity-Aware Transformations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.18679/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Identity document forgery has undergone a fundamental capability shift: generative AI tools now enable high-fidelity document synthesis and field-level manipulation with minimal technical expertise, while detection methods remain constrained by benchmarks that do not reflect this threat. The resulting attack surface spans physical presentation, digital injection, and fully generative synthesis, introducing distinct forensic failure modes that require a unified threat model and evaluation framework. This survey provides, to our knowledge, the first unified treatment of Presentation Attacks, Digital Injection Attacks, and GenAI-driven synthesis within a single identity verification threat model. We trace detection methodologies from rule-based heuristics through forensic localisation, injection-aware pipelines, foundation models, and few-shot frameworks. A systematic audit of public datasets from 2019--2025 exposes a persistent Reality Gap between benchmark conditions and operational deployment. We further analyse large multimodal models for identity document manipulation, identifying Script-Dependent Generative Instability (SDGI) as a recurring typographic failure mode in non-Latin script inpainting. Finally, zero-shot benchmarking on unseen synthesised ID cards shows that even the strongest publicly available models achieve APCER values above 25% under security-oriented operating conditions, highlighting substantial limits in cross-domain generalisation. We conclude by outlining future directions toward forensically grounded, privacy-preserving, and legally accountable identity verification systems.
