# What Memory Do GUI Agents Really Need? From Passive Records to Active Task-Driving States

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31612 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.31612/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in GUI and mobile agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 41 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [GUI and mobile agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/gui-and-mobile-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 41)

- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [UI-TARS: Pioneering Automated GUI Interaction with Native Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12326/) (2025)
- [AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14573/) (2024)
- [Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.02427/) (2023)
- [AppAgent: Multimodal Agents as Smartphone Users](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.13771/) (2023)
- [Android in the Wild: A Large-Scale Dataset for Android Device Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.10088/) (2023)
- [Mobile-Agent: Autonomous Multi-Modal Mobile Device Agent with Visual Perception](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.16158/) (2024)
- [UI-TARS-2 Technical Report: Advancing GUI Agent with Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02544/) (2025)
- [Mobile-Agent-v3: Fundamental Agents for GUI Automation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.15144/) (2025)
- [Mobile-Agent-v2: Mobile Device Operation Assistant with Effective Navigation via Multi-Agent Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01014/) (2024)
- [AutoDroid: LLM-powered Task Automation in Android](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.15272/) (2023)
- [Mobile-Agent-E: Self-Evolving Mobile Assistant for Complex Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.11733/) (2025)
- [AndroidLab: Training and Systematic Benchmarking of Android Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24024/) (2024)
- [UI-Venus Technical Report: Building High-performance UI Agents with RFT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10833/) (2025)
- [MAI-UI Technical Report: Real-World Centric Foundation GUI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.22047/) (2025)
- [SPA-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for SmartPhone Agent Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15164/) (2024)
- [Mobile-Agent-v3.5: Multi-platform Fundamental GUI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.16855/) (2026)
- [MobileWorld: Benchmarking Autonomous Mobile Agents in Agent-User Interactive and MCP-Augmented Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.19432/) (2025)
- [AppAgent v2: Advanced Agent for Flexible Mobile Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.11824/) (2024)
- [Explore, Select, Derive, and Recall: Augmenting LLM with Human-like Memory for Mobile Task Automation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03003/) (2023)
- [Mobile-Bench: An Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-based Mobile Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.00993/) (2024)
- [MobileGUI-RL: Advancing Mobile GUI Agent through Reinforcement Learning in Online Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05720/) (2025)
- [MobileRL: Online Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Mobile GUI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18119/) (2025)
- [UI-Venus-1.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.09082/) (2026)
- [Step-GUI Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.15431/) (2025)
- [UI-Ins: Enhancing GUI Grounding with Multi-Perspective Instruction-as-Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.20286/) (2025)
- [MGA: Memory-Driven GUI Agent for Observation-Centric Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.24168/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [FocusMem: Factorizing Content, Readout, and Trust in Latent GUI Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.04530/) (2026)
- [EchoPath: Execution-Level Replayable Memory for GUI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.16635/) (2026)
- [VISTA: A Visual Harness for Reasoning in an Interactive World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.02200/) (2026)
- [CausalCache: Conditional High-Fidelity Restoration for Long-Horizon GUI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.22577/) (2026)
- [Relevance Does Not Imply Applicability: Experience Activation for Personal GUI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33304/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Mobile GUI agents increasingly face long-horizon tasks that require reading, updating, and reusing task-relevant data across pages and applications. Existing methods treat memory largely as passive storage, where past observations are accumulated and retrieved when needed. Yet retrieving a value does not reveal its current role in the workflow. The agent must still infer from accumulated records whether the value should be used now, has already been used, or must wait for a later dependency. This implicit reconstruction becomes unreliable in long trajectories with repeated values, distractors, and outdated states, causing repeated or missed operations. To address this, we propose Active Task Driving Memory (ATMem), which shifts GUI-agent memory from passive storage to an actively maintained execution state. ATMem maintains task-relevant information as a continually updated execution state that links each value to its role and current status, enabling action selection based on the current workflow state. While supervised fine-tuning enables the agent to construct ATMem, it does not teach when ATMem is beneficial. We therefore introduce STR-GRPO, an online reinforcement learning method that encourages selective use of ATMem based on its contribution to task completion. STR-GRPO contrasts memory-on and memory-off rollouts to estimate when memory use improves execution, while memory-cost-aware reward discourages costly memory usage that does not improve execution. To evaluate whether agents can complete all in-scope work while avoiding out-of-scope actions, we build a challenging mobile benchmark. From a list of near identical entries, agents must act on every entry that satisfies the instruction and reject entries that violate its constraints. We further introduce App-Level Progress and Scope-Aware F1 to measure these two dimensions separately.