# Ask the World Before Acting: Environment Probing for Calibrated Agent World Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31422 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.31422/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in World models for language agents, one of 11 directions in World models.
- Builds on 23 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2026.

## Placed in

- World models / [World models for language agents](https://mlsanity.com/wm/world-models-for-language-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01691/) (2022)
- [Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16291/) (2023)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05221/) (2022)
- [AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03688/) (2023)
- [Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06070/) (2023)
- [ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03768/) (2020)
- [Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05608/) (2022)
- [Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04406/) (2023)
- [ScienceWorld: Is your Agent Smarter than a 5th Grader?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.07540/) (2022)
- [VisualWebArena: Evaluating Multimodal Agents on Realistic Visual Web Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.13649/) (2024)
- [Uncertainty of Thoughts: Uncertainty-Aware Planning Enhances Information Seeking in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03271/) (2024)
- [UltraHorizon: Benchmarking Agent Capabilities in Ultra Long-Horizon Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21766/) (2025)
- [Why Reasoning Fails to Plan: A Planning-Centric Analysis of Long-Horizon Decision Making in LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.22311/) (2026)
- [ReSpAct: Harmonizing Reasoning, Speaking, and Acting Towards Building Large Language Model-Based Conversational AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00927/) (2024)
- [GLOVE: Global Verifier for LLM Memory-Environment Realignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19249/) (2026)
- [RPMS: Enhancing LLM-Based Embodied Planning through Rule-Augmented Memory Synergy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.17831/) (2026)
- [Information Seeking for Robust Decision Making under Partial Observability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01531/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Plan Pointers and Record-Directive Form in Budgeted Verification of Inherited Agent Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.03450/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Language agents acting over long horizons must maintain beliefs about tool states, object locations, graph edges, and subgoal dependencies. When these beliefs drift, failures can be fixed neither by longer reasoning traces nor by ordinary self-reflection, since the missing evidence lies in the environment. We formulate environment probing as a budgeted decision problem for structured agent world models: before acting, the agent may query the current value of one belief field, update its table, and pay one interaction step. We introduce EnvProbe, a simple scoring policy that combines task criticality, staleness, verbalized uncertainty, and dependency role. A type-stratified analysis separates the benefit of belief repair from the cost of displaced task actions and predicts different behavior for procedural and spatial beliefs. In three controlled environments with gold belief states, EnvProbe improves terminal world-state accuracy over periodic probing by 11.76 percentage points on procedural tool-dependency tasks, 3.79 points on spatial tasks, and 6.45 points overall. Ablations show that task-structural terms are the main source of the gains, while self-reported uncertainty is unreliable under confident wrong beliefs. The results suggest that agent calibration should be treated as an action-selection problem over environment evidence, not only as a model-internal reasoning problem.